Jump to content
  • Polydesmaster tentugalensis (Soares & Devriès, 1967)


    Images:

    ricardo

    Taxonomy

    Kingdom: Animalia
    Phylum: Echinodermata
    Class: Echinoidea
    Order: Spatangoida
    Family: ----
    Genus: Polydesmaster
    Species: Polydesmaster tentugalensis
    Author Citation (Soares & Devriès, 1967)

    Geological Time Scale

    Eon: Phanerozoic
    Era: Mesozoic
    Period: Cretaceous
    Sub Period: None
    Epoch: Late
    International Age: Cenomanian

    Stratigraphy

    Tentúgal Formation
    C level

    Provenance

    Collector: Ricardo Pimentel
    Date Collected: 12/16/2021
    Acquired by: Field Collection

    Location

    Coimbra
    Portugal

    Comments

    Original name:

    Mundaster tentugalensis Soares & Devriès, 1967 

     

    Original description: 

    Soares, A. F. & Devriès, A. (1967). Un genre nouveau de la famille des Pericosmidae dans le Crétacé du Portugal. Memórias e Notícias, 63, 55-63.

     

    Other description:

    Markov, A. V. & Solovjev, A. N. (2001). Echinoids of the family Paleopneustidae (Echinoidea, Spatangoida): morphology, taxonomy, phylogeny. Geos 2001: 1-109.

     

    Taxonomic citation:

    Kroh, A.; Mooi, R. (2021). World Echinoidea Database. Mundaster tentugalensis Soares & Devriès, 1967 †. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/Echinoidea/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=756181 on 2022-01-15

     

    Occurrence: 

    Cenomanian of Portugal. 

    Only holotype and paratype specimens were known. This specimen found in december 2021 records traces of color.




    User Feedback


    @ricardo 

    :) Interesting specimen.  I have seen it on your website.  Do you have any additional images of the lateral views?  Have you confirmed the apical plate orientation?  Do the ambulacral petals seem longer in your specimen compared to the one figured on The Echinoid Directory?  

     

    Capture+_2022-01-16-11-16-57~2.png

     

    Capture+_2022-01-16-11-26-40~2.png

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ricardo

    Posted (edited)

     

    On 1/16/2022 at 5:47 PM, JohnJ said:

    Do you have any additional images of the lateral views?  Have you confirmed the apical plate orientation?  Do the ambulacral petals seem longer in your specimen compared to the one figured on The Echinoid Directory?  

     

    Hello John. Thank you very much for the pertinent questions. I'll give you my opinion on the specimen :)
    In my opinion the petal extension is an optical illusion as the test end is missing.
    The identification was based on the original work (since I don't have the Russian work). I compared the morphology of the apical disc with the original drawings (concerning the arrangement of the gonopores and the shape and arrangement of the madreporite) and I also compared it with the apical discs of the other Spatangoida that occur in the Formation.
    The lateral profile and size is also completely different from all the others, the example being very good in the anterior side profile (the posterior side of the profile is more difficult to observe due to the matrix and part missing).

    I had the opportunity a few years ago to see the holotype and the paratype, maybe one day I will be able to compare the specimens in loco.
    If the identification is correct, it will be an important specimen, so I won't keep it for long. 

     

    I have attached a photo with the side view, but it is not particularly enlightening.

     

    Greetings,

     

    Ricardo

    mundaster_lateral_view.png

    Edited by ricardo

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thank you for sharing the additional information, Ricardo.  The apical morphology is cited as a distinguishing characteristic.  If you have performed comparisons, using magnification, it gives great confidence to to your identification.  Congratulations on this discovery.

     

    If you have better magnified photos of the apical disc, they would be an excellent addition to this entry.  Thanks.  ;)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ricardo

    Posted (edited)

     

    Thanks for the discussion, John.
    I hope that the new images will allow a better understanding of the identification options arising from the observation of the apical disc.

     

     

    Edited by ricardo
    New images.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great research and images, Ricardo!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ricardo

    Posted (edited)

    John, thank you!

     

    Diapositivo1.PNG

     

    Diapositivo2.PNG

    Edited by ricardo

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...