Jump to content
  • Sicyophorus rara Luo & Hu 1999


    Images:

    oilshale

    Taxonomy

    Priapulid worm

    Kingdom: Animalia
    Phylum: Priapulida Théel 1906
    Class: incertae sedis
    Order: incertae sedis
    Family: incertae sedis
    Genus: Sicyophorus
    Species: Sicyophorus rara
    Author Citation Luo & Hu in Luo, Hu, Chen, Zhang & Tao, 1999

    Geological Time Scale

    Eon: Phanerozoic
    Era: Paleozoic
    Period: Cambrian
    Sub Period: None
    Epoch: Early
    International Age: Age 2, "Stage 3"

    Stratigraphy

    Heilinpu Formation

    Biostratigraphy

    Eoredlichia–Wutingaspis Zone

    Provenance

    Acquired by: Purchase/Trade

    Dimensions

    Length: 1 cm

    Location

    Haikou
    Kunming Town
    Yunnan Province
    China

    Comments

    Possible synonyms Protopriapulites haikouensis Hou, Bergström, Wang, Feng & Chen, 1999.
    The correct name is Sicyophorus rara and not as often found Sicyophorus rarus.

    Description from Hou et al. 2017, p 124: "This is a relatively common priapulid‐like worm, known from over a thousand specimens. In many cases the material consists of compressed, complete individuals, and the posterior half of the body is often better preserved with an apparently rigid outline. Detailed structures can be detected by subtle differences in color and relief. The size of the animal is generally about 1cm long. The overall body shape is reminiscent of a dumb‐bell, with a sub-equally expanded introvert and posterior trunk connected by a constricted neck region. The introvert bears spine‐like scalids arranged in about 20 longitudinal rows and 14 circlets. The narrower anterior part of the proboscis is protrusive and appears to bear a regular array of tiny spines. The trunk cuticle is apparently more rigid than the introvert, and is covered in a series of 13–15 longitudinal plates divided by dark ridges. The distinct gut is heavily coiled and filled with sediment, almost entirely occupying the ovoid trunk."
    Line drawing from Hou et al. 2017, p. 124:
    image.png.8bc744f5b617e90d568d0514778eb6e9.png

    References:
    Luo, Huilin, Hu, Shixue, Chen, L., Zhang, S., Tao, Y. (1999). Early Cambrian Chengjiang fauna from Kunming region, China. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming, pp. 1–189 (in Chinese with English summary).
    D. Y. Huang, J. Vannier, and J. Y. Chen (2004). Anatomy and lifestyles of Early Cambrian priapulid worms exemplified by Corynetis and Anningvermis from the Maotianshan Shale (SW China). Lethaia 37:21-33.
    S. Q. Dornbos and J.-Y. Chen (2008) Community palaeoecology of the early Cambrian Maotianshan Shale biota: Ecological dominance of priapulid worms. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 258:200-212.
    Andreas Maas, Diying Huang, Junyuan Chen, Dieter Waloszek, Andreas Braun (2007). Maotianshan-Shale nemathelminths — Morphology, biology, and the phylogeny of Nemathelminthes. , 254(1-2), 0–306.
    Hou et al. (2017) The Cambrian Fossils of Chengjiang, China: The Flowering of Early Animal Life, 2nd Edition. Wiley-Blackwell.  DOI:10.1002/9781118896372.




    User Feedback


    MarcusFossils

    Posted

    I've seen specimen with the distinct coiled gut described as Palaeopriapulites parvus

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    oilshale

    Posted (edited)

     

    1 hour ago, MarcusFossils said:

    I've seen specimen with the distinct coiled gut described as Palaeopriapulites parvus

    Quote from 'The Cambrian Fossils of Chengjiang, China: the flowering of Early Animal Life', p. 126:

    "Palaeopriapulites parvus is the only known species of the genus. It shares striking similarities with Sicyophorus rara Luo & Hu, 1999, and has been suggested to be a possible synonym of the latter species (Chen Liang‐zhong et  al. 2002; Huang 2005). However, P. parvus is distinctly different from Sicyophorus in its lack of a heavily coiled gut filling the trunk region (Hou et al. 2004a) and its lack of rigid loricate‐like plates covering the trunk."

     

    Edited by oilshale

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    MarcusFossils

    Posted

    Right you are! I was looking at "The Dawn of the Animal World" (2004) and mixed up the ordering of the photographs. Wonderful specimen! 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...