Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'brush creek limestone'.
-
Hello, This specimen comes from the Pennsylvanian Period of Allegheny County, PA. It is from the Glenshaw Formation and is probably Brush Creek Limestone. The texture appears to be bone. Thanks for the help.
- 6 replies
-
- glenshaw formation
- marine
- (and 4 more)
-
I just don't know what this thing is. It's from the Glenshaw Formation of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Some is below the matrix, but what is showing is about 1 cm top to bottom and 1.5 cm across. I believe it is Brush Creek Limestone and it looks like part of a fish spine to me. As always all help is appreciated. Thanks.
- 3 replies
-
- 1
-
- carboniferous
- pennsylvanian
- (and 5 more)
-
I have no idea what this thing is. I found it in Allegheny County today in the Pennsylvanian Glenshaw Formation in what I think is Brush Creek Limestone. Unfortunately it is only part of the fossil, but I thought the pattern might tip someone off as to what it is. Scale is in metric. Thanks for the help.
- 9 replies
-
- 2
-
- pennsylvanian
- carboniferous
- (and 5 more)
-
I have no idea what this is. It's unlike anything I have found. I split it out of Brush Creek Limestone today. Pennsylvanian Period, Glenshaw Formation. It's about 25 cm in circumference at the base. I would guess cephalopod, but it's much bigger than one's I've previously found. Help is appreciated, thanks!
- 3 replies
-
- marine
- brush creek limestone
- (and 4 more)
-
Found this critter in what I believe to be the Brush Creek Limestone. It is Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian), Glenshaw Formation, and looks like a nautilus to me, so I'd guess Solenochilus. Thanks for the help.
- 4 replies
-
- 2
-
- carboniferous
- pennsylvanian
- (and 5 more)
-
Howdy! I found a beautiful pseudorthoceras last week and last night I noticed a tiny white organism on the rock. It looks like several "Vs" strung together. Fossil is 0.5 cm, is from the Glenshaw Formation and likely Brush Creek Limestone. I have no idea what this thing is. Thanks for the help.
- 2 replies
-
- pennsylvanian
- limestone
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Found what looks like a tooth fragment last week. I've only ever found Petalodus teeth in this formation and it doesn't quite look like those. There are no serrations on the fragment. This was found in Allegheny County, PA, is from the Glenshaw Formation and is probably out of the Brush Creek Limestone.Thanks for the help.
- 2 replies
-
- pennsylvanian
- carboniferous
- (and 5 more)
-
Hello, found what I think are nautiloids and brachiopods. I found the rock in a stream and I can't say what limestone (maybe brush creek or pine creek), but the area is Glenshaw Formation in northern Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. It's quite difficult for me to get good pictures, let alone good pictures with scale, so I'll tell you that the first two pictures are 2 cm (same organism), the second is 5.5 cm and the largest Nautilus in the last pictures is about 6 cm. All information is appreciated, thanks!
- 14 replies
-
- 3
-
- carboniferous
- pennsylvanian
- (and 7 more)
-
Howdy! Found this little critter today in Allegheny county, Pennsylvania. It is Pennsylvanian, Glenshaw Formation, probably Brush Creek Limestone. It's a bit different from the ones I'm used to finding and I don't see anything similar in my guides. It is approximately 1.75 cm x 1.25 cm. Even if it can't be ID'd I'd appreciate it if someone could tell me if it's brachiopod or bi-valve. Thanks in advance.
- 4 replies
-
- pennsylvanian
- carboniferous
- (and 5 more)
-
Hello all. I am posting a link to a calendar I created for 2023. It showcases twelve different late Paleozoic gastropods I have recovered over the past three years in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. Eleven of them are from the Pine Creek limestone, and one other comes from the Brush Creek limestone. Each month features a different gastropod, photographed after coating it using ammonium chloride vapor, using an iPhone to capture photos through a microscope lens. The cover photo showcases all twelve, and the images for each month typically showcase an additional view at a much larger size. While this is a color print calendar, all the content throughout is black & white. If you enjoy natural color photos of fossils, you might skip this. I am selling this calendar without profit to me. I am still waiting to receive my copy, and I can follow up on print quality when I get mine. Lulu says this is 100 lb paper, but I'm still determining what to expect. Please PM me for purchase information.
-
- conemaugh group
- kasimovian
- (and 10 more)
-
Howdy! I've been hunting mostly plant fossils in the Pittsburgh area for about two years. This is a sampling of some of my favorite pieces. I hope you enjoy! All are Glenshaw Formation finds. 1. Neuropteris fimbriata 2. Metacoceras 3. Metacoceras 4. Asterophyllites 5. Lepidodendron obovatum 6. Neuropteris Ovata 7. Crenulopteris acadica 8. Brachiopod, Linoproductus? 9. There are over 50 little fossils on this plate, lots of Cyathocarpus arborea and I think Calamites and Psaronius "bark" 10. Cyathocarpus arborea 11. Crenulopteris acadica and stem and bark? 12. Crenulopteris acadica and Alethopteris 13. Crenulopteris acadica, Altheopteris 14. Calamites 15. Neochonetes 16. Crenulopteris acadica 17. Neuropteroid, Neuropteris Ovata? 18. Crenulopteris acadica 19. Cyathocarpus arborea and Calamites 20. Neuropteris 21. Not sure about the one on top, but the other two look like Crenulopteris acadica 22. Big Calamite 23. Crenulopteris acadica and Calamites 24. Aphlebia/Rhacophyllum? 25. Neuropteris scheuchzeri 26. Neuropteris ovata 27. Asterophyllites 28. Sphenopteroid 29. Neuropteris 30. Alethopteris 31. Asterophyllites 32. Petalodus tooth 33. Brachiopod 34. Neuropteroid frond 35. Aphlebia/Rhacophyllum? 36. Annularia 37. Lots of brachiopods 38. Neuropteris ovata 39. Horn coral, stereostylus 40. Cephalopod, pseudorthoceras
- 45 replies
-
- 13
-
- invertebrates
- brush creek limestone
- (and 4 more)
-
Howdy! Split some limestone (I think it's Brush Creek) to find dozens of poorly preserved brachiopods and now I need some help IDing. Thanks in advance for any help. @cngodles
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
- pennsylvanian
- glenshaw formation
- (and 5 more)
-
I've had this for quite some time, I thought it may have been a gastropod. But I'm now very convinced I have an ammonoid. They are very rare over my way, they didn't like coming into the geologically temporary shallow sea bays that formed. We have many Nautiloids, but not many Goniatitids. I've considered Pennoceras and Mangeroceras. The former is reported from rocks of similar age in Ohio, but the shell ornament has me considering the latter. The growth lines curve back towards the posterior at the dorsal-lateral shoulders. Anyone from the mid-continent (who are swimming in ammonoids at places) have a good ID for this one? Scale bar = 5 mm. Conemaugh Group Glenshaw Formation Brush Creek limestone
- 1 reply
-
- 2
-
- brush creek limestone
- goniatitida
- (and 3 more)
-
I'm chipping away at what I think is brush creek limestone to find what I think is Mooreoceras (first two pics) and Metacoceras. I have no idea what the last fossil is. All help is appreciated, thank you.
- 2 replies
-
- pennsylvanian
- glenshaw formation
- (and 5 more)
-
Whatever this fish tooth is, I've never found one before. I had a small sliver showing in a rock and spent over an hour slowly air scribing over it and getting it to this point. I'm hesitant to go much further, as I may break it. I considered Polyacrodus for the shape, but I see none with the pitted pattern that this has. Tired of trying to ID Pennsylvanian fish teeth yet, @connorp? Maybe this is another paver type teeth from a ray, etc. For scale, the length of the tooth in the first photo is 13 mm.
- 6 replies
-
- 6
-
- pennsylvanian
- glenshaw formation
- (and 7 more)
-
I just have so many questions, thanks for your patience. Found these two pieces in what, I think, is Brush Creek Limestone; they're definitely Pennsylvanian Period and from Allegheny County, PA. The first one is 3 cm x 1 cm, the second is about 2.5 cm long.
- 7 replies
-
- 6
-
- pennsylvanian
- brush creek limestone
- (and 5 more)
-
Howdy! Chiseled this out of a rock today. I thought it was a coral at first, but not quite sure now. The final picture is a cross section of the inside. Thanks in advance.
- 5 replies
-
- 1
-
- glenshaw formation
- brush creek limestone
- (and 5 more)
-
Found this the other day in what I think is brush creek limestone. The area is Glenshaw Formation, Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian). All help is appreciated.
- 18 replies
-
- 1
-
- glenshaw formation
- brush creek limestone
- (and 3 more)
-
Hello all. Quite a time back I found this shiny black thing in a piece of Brush Creek limestone. I had tentatively identified it as a trilobite free cheek part. However, a trip to the museum has the invertebrate paleontology department telling me that it's not for two reasons. While similar looking as a free cheek, the top portion doesn't match It's way too big to be a trilobite from this time period. I do agree with both assessments. It's twice the size of a typical Kasimovian (Late Pennsylvanian) trilobite from here. So, any fish part or tooth experts here? Perhaps this matches something that someone has seen. The connection at the junction where it turns into a point is interesting to me. Much more detail:
- 2 replies
-
- pennsylvanian
- glenshaw formation
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
This one has been sitting in my "interesting but I have no clue" pile for a while. When I found it, I was splitting limestone laying in the stream. I've found that when you split limestone, immediately after splitting you'll get a couple moments of a sharp looking specimen before things start to oxidize. The limestone is a very dark gray, or almost black color. You either see black limestone or white calcite pieces while splitting. I split this particular piece open and right in the middle was a 3-4 cm long, 8 mm wide gold looking rectangle in the middle of the flat broken limestone. I thought I wouldn't get to recover it, but one hammer hit later it popped out and I was able to save it. I do find that plants in the limestone seem to get the gold or pyrite type preservation. I've found one small straight shelled cephalopod preserved like this. But overall, it's very rare here. I have maybe 3 or 4 larger pieces of what I'd called pyrite type material I've recovered. Below are some stacked microscope photos of it. The scale in the first photo is 1 mm for each mark. You can see the grain that runs left to right. This looks like wood to me, but I haven't had that confirmed before. The next two photos are a view looking from the bottom to the top of the first photo. What has me most curious are the perpendicular grain marks that are found in this area. They don't seem to just be on the outermost layer, as you can see more deeper. I'm not sure if this is some sort of perpendicular crystal pattern, or it's just the shape of the original material that was replaced with the mineral. And maximum zoom. A stack of 12 microscope images taken through the lens in the same area of the above photo. And that's it. Is this a small piece of woody material that was preserved in the sea? I wonder if vinegar would clean this up or destroy the mineral as well.
- 14 replies
-
- carboniferous
- glenshaw formation
- (and 7 more)
-
When cleaning up rocks I brought home today, I found this little piece that I didn't originally target. It's pentagon shape makes me believe it's for sure a fossil. I've never found anything like it, so I feel like I'm about to get an education here. Perhaps part of a crinoid? Whatever it is, I don't have the experience, yet. Also noticed the indented hole on the top. Maybe part of it, maybe not. It's way too centered I think to not be part of it. Underside. It is convex with a small raised ridge along the edge. Sideways view of the underside with scale: Front view with scale (non focus stacked) There is a porous layer on top, which is very similar to crinoids I've seen in the past. I've only ever found stems.
- 15 replies
-
- glenshaw formation
- carboniferous
- (and 4 more)
-
Found this small oddity while breaking apart limestone. The pitted appearance was interesting. The pits also seem to extend the whole way through. They also appear to wrap at a 90 degree angle on the side that isn't broken. The broken side reveals how they go through. I chipped away a little at the matrix, but didn't go too tough to keep from breaking it. Whole specimen with scale: (stacked photo) Showing outside 90 degree wrapped edge with same appearance: (stacked photo) Broken edge showing channels going through the width. Additional view of the top (unstacked photo)
- 22 replies
-
- 2
-
- carboniferous
- western pennsylvania
- (and 5 more)
-
So most of what I find is Metacoceras or Pseudorthoceras, two very common cephalopods locally. I've found a few Solenochilus, but they are different enough that I know what I found right away. This specimen was discovered as a body chamber. I thought Metacoceras, because, why not? Anything of this shape usually is. After some moderate prep, I revealed some more body chamber, but not any suture marks. The venter is oddly shaped as well, with a shallow U shape. It might be crushed, so I didn't pay it too much mind. I also discovered that the body chamber is much larger than any Metacoceras specimen I have found to date. In viewing the paper A NAUTILOID CEPHALOPOD FAUNA FROM THE PENNSYLVANIAN WINTERSET LIMESTONE OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI (full paper), I found plate 5 which features Domatoceras. They are known to exist here, but I've never found anything definitive. Here is the plate from the article: Here is a Metacoceras (CG-0071) on the left, and the specimen in question (CG-0068) on the right. Here is the venter of CG-0068 showing the two ridges marked with arrows. I feel these are similar to the ridges shown in Figure 2 of Plate 5 And that is that. Any cephalopod people have an opinion? I could prep it more, it's just at the labor intensive micro prepping state right now with solid cement like limestone overlaying it. One more photo of it for some additional context:
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
- pennsylvanian
- glenshaw formation
- (and 7 more)
-
I've had this specimen sitting in my "I'll get to it later" pile since last year. I've learned a lot about Cephalopods the past year, one of them being the differences between Nautiloids and Ammonoids. Upon re-inspection of this yesterday, I noticed the shell lines, but more importantly the suture lines caught my eye. These do exist here, but I would call them pretty rare to find. Not being an expert, I would consider Wellerites or Schistoceras, but these are based on quick comparisons using a Pennsylvanian Cephalopods of Ohio book I have. I started to clean up the rock using an air scribe, but I've only got about 30 minutes into it so far. I need to take much better photos, but the shell exterior is messy like this. You really need to rotate it under light and/or a microscope to see the sutures great. There is so scale in the photo, but it's 20mm from front to back of the inner exposed whorl. The top of the photo is still more shell continuing on another 9mm and I started to expose more suture pattern there. The top of the exposed whorl has some shell material pattern shown in a black color.
- 6 replies
-
- 2
-
- glenshaw formation
- pennsylvanian
- (and 5 more)