Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'dubious'.
-
I have often seen teeth for sale labelled as "Liodon anceps" and on occasion "Mosasaurus anceps". My understanding is that the genus is dubious, and I personally suspect most material labelled as Liodon is actually from a species of Prognathodon of some description, but I'm not sure the exact current state and would appreciate any guidance. Also, should this topic be in the wrong place, my apologies. Thanks in advance for any information Othniel
-
From the album: Texas Echinoids, ERose
These plates show up in the echinoid marker bed of Unit 2, Lower Member, Glen Rose Formation, Trinity Group (Albian) of Comal County, Texas. They were brought to my attention by JohnJ of the FF and I sent images to Andrew Smith at the BNHM. Smith confirmed/identified them as being in the FAMILY Echinothuriidae. Subsequently Bill Thompson named them Echinothuria mcallae after Linda McCall who had placed specimens in the Non-vertebrate Lab Collection at the University of Texas. Note: there are no known associations of these plates that come anywhere close to a complete specimen. I consider Thompson's species dubious based on incomplete material. He has also named a variety of lantern parts found in those same layers as belonging to this "species" without any actual association. And there are several other echinoids found in the same bed that could easily be the source of the lantern parts. He also has includes obvious cidarid spines under the species, again without any actual association. *the genus Echinothuria is known from the Upper Cretaceous of Great Britain.-
- dubious
- echinothuriidae
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I hardly dare to ask, ... Here is an online offer from someone without even a single feedback, claiming to offer one of the rarest things there is: a piece of narwhale tusk. Looks like flint or agate to me. maybe good for a laugh?
- 10 replies