Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'juvenile t rex tooth'.
-
From the album: Hell Creek / Lance Formations
A young T. rex tooth. The preservation of the enamel is fantastic, and I like the dark hues. The serrations are also in great shape. There is some minor feeding wear on the tip.-
- hell creek
- hell creek formation
- (and 12 more)
-
Identification: This tooth was sold as being from a Dromaeosaur. The serrations' shape and their similarity on both carinae say otherwise. In the Hell Creek Formation, there are potentially two Tyrannosaur species. If Nanotyrannus is invalid, then this is automatically a T. rex tooth. For those who consider Nanotyrannus to be valid, this tooth is still T. rex based on the robustness of the tip and serrations, and the CHR (Crown Height Ratio). Tyrannosaurus maxillary teeth may still have minor basal compression, as this one does. This is from a juvenile animal based on its small size and feeding wear (thus it's not a germ tooth). Thanks to @Troodon and @hxmendoza for their help with identification. I also contacted Christophe Hendrickx, who also said it was from a young T. rex. Other: Mesial Serration Density: ~ 4 serrations / mm. Distal Serration Density: ~ 4 serrations / mm. Note: Serration density alone is not an identifying feature of Tyrannosaur teeth this small. This tooth is from the right maxilla based on the wear on the lingual face. Feeding wear is also visible on some of the serrations. Citation: OSBORN, HENRY, 1905. Tyrannosaurus and other Cretaceous carnivorous dinosaurs, Bulletin of the AMNH, Volume 21, Article 14, Pages 259-265, https://digitallibrary.amnh.org/handle/2246/1464
-
- 12
-
- c(hc)tr3
- hell creek
- (and 6 more)
-
Identification: Originally listed as a Dromaeosaurid tooth, I suspected it was from a Tryannosaurid. Upon receiving the tooth, I contacted a few paleontologists to get expert opinions. Their conclusion was that the tooth was likely from a baby/juvenile Tyrannosaur. Since the only Tyrannosaurs in the Hell Creek Formation are Tyrannosaurus rex and Nanotyrannus lancensis (or only T. rex if N. lancensis is a young T. rex), and considering the cross-section of the base of the tooth, this must be from a baby Tyrannosaurus rex. This tooth shares many qualities with adult teeth, a fact which the experts used to justify their identification. The large denticles (serrations) on both carinae (cutting edges) are similar in shape and size, there's virtually no recurvature, no twisting of the carinae, and it has an oval base. The overall shape of the tooth also suggests that it's from the posterior region of the mouth. Among the attached photos are juxtapositions with a high-quality cast replica of an adult T. rex (Stan) posterior tooth, and a juvenile N. lancensis tooth (also from the Hell Creek Formation). Other: Mesial Serration Density: ~ 5.5 - 6 serrations / mm Distal Serration Density: ~ 5 - 5.5 serrations / mm Note: Serration density alone is not an identifying feature of Tyrannosaur teeth this small. Identifiers: The people that support this identification are: @Troodon (experienced and knowledgable collector on TFF); Dr. Philip J. Currie (noted paleontologist, museum curator, and professor specializing in Tyrannosaurs); Dr. David DeMar Jr. (research associate in the Department of Paleobiology of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution); and Dr. Christophe Hendrickx (postdoctoral researcher specializing in the evolution of theropod dentitions). Citation: OSBORN, HENRY, 1905. Tyrannosaurus and other Cretaceous carnivorous dinosaurs, Bulletin of the AMNH, Volume 21, Article 14, Pages 259-265, https://digitallibrary.amnh.org/handle/2246/1464
-
- 5
-
- baby t rex tooth
- c(hc)tr2
- (and 6 more)