I recall reading on the boards somewhere before that hadrosaur tooth crowns can sometimes be assigned to either the Lambeosaurinae or the Saurolophinae if enough of the crown is present. I was wondering if the same can be said for ceratopsid teeth? Can ceratopsid teeth from localities in which members of both subfamilies are known ever be identified down to subfamily?
This question was prompted by both general curiosity and by the fact that I occasionally see isolated ceratopsid teeth sold down to the generic level (ie, one seller who has listings for Avaceratops, Judiceratops, and Medusaceratops spitters), and although I am almost certain you cannot make a generic-level identification of isolated teeth it does make me wonder whether or not these "identifications" could be based on subfamily designation? And if so, what's the diagnostic character/s for each?