Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'uzbekistan'.
-
So when I purchased this tooth it was listed as Timurlengia, however I know there have been recent discoveries of both a large Dromaeosaurid and carcharodontosaurid from this formation. Is there any way to figure out if this is Tyrannosauroid for sure? Uzbekistan - Bissekty Formation @Troodon
-
Is this a Timurlengia tooth? I found this tooth for sale as belonging to Timur Lengia. So I would like to let everyone on the forum know. Thanks in advance. [Fossil overall size] 38.57 x 18.36 x 8.19 (mm) [Fossil weight] 5.5 (g) [Fossil production area] Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan
-
For those of you that collect material from Uzbekistan this is interesting. The attached "PAYWALLED" paper describes a very large Digit II-2 phalanx that belongs to a giant Dromaeosaurid. The article also raises questions around the recently described Ulughbegsaurus uzbekistanensis but need to read the publication if I can get my hands on it. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/geological-magazine/article/abs/giant-dromaeosaurid-theropod-from-the-upper-cretaceous-turonian-bissekty-formation-of-uzbekistan-and-the-status-of-ulughbegsaurus-uzbekistanensis/4543ABAB1EC19C84405EDF66A5F53124#
-
- 1
-
-
- bissekty formation
- dromaeosaurid
- (and 2 more)
-
A new alvarezsaurid theropod, Dzharaonyx eski, is documented by a variety of dissociated but well-preserved postcranial bones from the Upper Cretaceous (Turonian) Bissekty Formation at Dzharakuduk, Uzbekistan SVP- paywalled https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2021.2036174#.YioDnNOKB1s.twitter I have not seen any of these on the commercial market, has anyone?
-
Any identificationfor this Uzbekistan tooth would be helpful - UPDATED NEW PHOTOS
AJ the Tyrant posted a topic in Fossil ID
I came across this tooth recently, but I (nor the seller) can figure out a decent identification for it. It’s an unknown theropod tooth from the Bissekty Formation in Uzbekistan. This is what the seller said about the specimen, “This tooth is much different from other Tyrannosauroid teeth from Bissekty. Less compressed and more rounded with much finer serrations. I believe it may be an undescribed species of theropod.” Is there any way to figure out at least a vague identification for this tooth? AC004AA5-21F2-40EF-88DF-1B6D7EAAB606.webp ECFA6C29-3CAD-4B84-98FE-B4D51F5FAD12.webp 072D8201-307F-4120-9EA1-AC550A7B303F.webp 1EDDCF06-2DF9-4403-9567-7B4440B05A97.webp 66469C72-BCEF-4EE7-A5EC-1E8D9DB4664F.webp (Sorry for the messed up files/images; my storage is all used up) -
A number of us have seen teeth that have a morphology somewhat similar to a Carcharodontosaurid from the Bissekty Formation of Uzbekistan but were not Tyrannosauroid. This paper describes Ulughbegsaurus uzbekistanensis a new Carcharodontosaurian from that locality. The holotype does not include teeth but my guess is that those with Carch morphology can be assigned (opinion changed below) to this new taxon until we see more published. This taxon is not a Carcharodontosaurid and its classification appears to be uncertain depending on which phylogenetic analysis is used. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.210923 @-Andy- @hxmendoza @Runner64
- 8 replies
-
- 7
-
-
-
- bisskety formation
- ulughbegsaurus uzbekistanensis
- (and 1 more)
-
Hello everyone! ive got three slabs of prints created by an unknown prehistoric animal (if it’s even created by an animal) that had been in my collection for quite some time now. Since I’m on the forum and still requires a proper identification for it any identification help from ichnofossil experts are much appreciated! Here are some pictures of the fossils but since the prints might not be that clearly seen I uploaded some other pictures highlighting the “lumps” or the pattern made by the print. Hope that helps.
-
I have here two theropod teeth from the Bissekty Formation of Uzbekistan. I believe they're Timurlengia. Can that identification be made? First one is 1.08" long and 0.55" wide
-
I have here two crocodile teeth from the Bissekty Formation of Uzbekistan, and one from Morocco. I'd appreciate any help identifying them. Uzbekistan I 1.28" long, 0.39" wide
-
Stabilized with Butvar B-76; repaired using an unspecified cyanoacrylate. Identified by Dr. Alexander Averianov as a sacral vertebrae of a juvenile Levnesovia transoxiana. The specimen is either from Dzarakuduk or an excavation near the city of Uchkuduk many years back.
-
- 2
-
-
- bissekty formation
- cretaceous
- (and 12 more)
-
Hi A few weeks ago I acquired a small ungual that was found in the Kyzyl Kum desert in Uzbekistan (Bissekty Fm). It looks like a hadrosaur hoof to me. I assume a more detailed ID is not possible though. Do you agree? Thanks Felix
-
Hello. I was wondering if anyone could help me identify this tooth from a friend’s collection. It comes from the Bissekty formation in Uzebekistan. It is 1.81 inches (4.6 cm) long. I think fish, pterosaur, crocodylimorph, or aquatic reptile are potential identities. Please let me know if more pictures are required. Thank you for your help.
-
Hey guys, I saw this tooth from Uzbekistan labeled as undescribed and as a possible Dromaeosaurid. Is it? Does someone have an idea? Maybe @Troodon can help on this one. It is 3,2cm. Here are some pictures. Thanks and kind regards!
-
Hello everybody, I recently acquired these three beautiful teeth from the Bissekty formation. The seller wasn't sure about the ID. I think they may be crocodilomorphs teeth based on the geometry. I did some research and I found that in the Bissekty formation there are at least four different crocodilomorphs. Can anyone help me better identifying these teeth.
-
This is a tooth I have purchased, and I was wondering if anyone had any idea on a species for this guy? The seller said it was from Uzbekistan, but the colors are very different from teeth I've seen from that area. Any input or information is greatly appreciated! The tooth is 2.75 inches long.
-
Hi all, I have been staring at this tooth for quite a while now with question marks in my head. It was found in the Bissekty Formation, Kyzylkum desert, Uzbekistan. It's 27mm long (1.01 inch) and properly labeled as Theropod indet. However, the seller raises the possibility of it being a Dromaeosaurid. Serrations do look different in length and width, a count on screen gives me distal 13/5mm and mesial 16/5mm. What throws me off is the rather 'stout' crown and round cross section, more Tyrannosaurid in my view. However, I have no reference images and the only publication I found (Sues and Averianov 2014) is not exactly helpful. I posted available images - I could contact the seller if additional information is required. Any input is highly appreciated.
- 6 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- bissekty formation
- dromaeosaurid
- (and 3 more)
-
Hi guys, I have recently acquired this tooth. It was sold as a Tyrannosauridae indet tooth from Bissekty Formation. I thought it could be Timurlengia, but i was not sure. From what I read, not much Timurlengia material has been found.. The tooth is about 2 inch long, and it is a little bit worn out. Its serrations are quite small. The serration density is about 12 denticles per 5mm. I am hoping someone can confirm the species for me?
-
Uzbekistan Bissekty formation Theropod teeth
BadlandTraveller posted a topic in Is It Real? How to Recognize Fossil Fabrications
Hello, I lack teeth in my collection from the Bissekty and a number of theropod teeth have popped up on a popular auction site from a seemingly reliable seller. None of them are super special but I am curious if I should pull the trigger or wait for better material? I don't see Bissekty material often and would have trouble doing a proper ID.. Thank you.thumb.jpg.ab4b177030bcbba1fd3c7f40e7ca8426.jpg)
-
Here is another piece of my dinosaur collection - this time material from Eurasian countries. Unfortunately don't have any Triassic or Early Jurassic material, so let's begin with Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) of Itat formation, Krasnoyarskyi region, Russia. Theropods are the most common dinosaurs from there, yet their teeth rarely exceed 15 mm in length. Here is my largest one - could be from Kileskus aristotocus, an early Proceratosaurid (ancestor of Cretaceous tyrannosaurs) and the only described dinosaur from this location. Here are a bunch of Kileskus teeth I had before There also likely were more theropod species, similar to contemporary Chinese Dashanpu formation - methriacanthosaurids (equivalent to Sinraptor), megalosaurids and ceratosaurs. Some teeth I have or had that could be megalosaurids due to bulkier shape and finer serrations (all around 1 cm). In addition I have some specimens from diverse herbivores - Stegosaurids Long-necked sauropods (Mamenchisauridae), possible embryonic teeth Heterodontosaurid fang tooth, 5 mm (huge for this species!)
- 18 replies
-
- 11
-
-
Bought this specimen as a crocodile jaw section a while ago, it is from Turonian of Bissekty formation, Uzbekistan. Teeth were definitely conical, which fits only two groups in that area - sauropods and crocodiles, but recently after looking at some skulls I noticed that it really doesn't fit crocodile skulls - both Alligatorid and Pholidosaurid. What it seems to fit, is a titanosaur sauropod maxilla (Tapuiasaurus macedoi skull on the pictures below). Please confirm if I am imagining things here or (hopefully) not @LordTrilobite @Troodon And an Alligator skull for comparison
-
From the album: Dinosaurs and Reptiles
-
- 1
-
-
- bissekty
- therizinosauria
- (and 1 more)
-
I added this Timurlengia euotoca tooth to my collection. The question I have is this a Tyrannosaur or Tyrannosaurid tooth. I ask that because the serrations are very fine and it's compressed unlike any other Tyrannosaurids I've seen in North America. Thanks
-
I recently bought this 3" jaw section from the Bissekty Formation. The seller had it listed as Turanoceratops. I was a little skeptical since I knew at least one Hadrosaur is found there and small Hadrosaur and Ceratopsian jaw sections I've seen look very similar to me. I also found this exact fossil in another thread (below), where @Troodon said it and several others looked like Hadrosaurid jaws. Is it definitely from a hadrosaur or could it be Turanoceratops? I'm happy either way but would like to know what to label it.
-
Hey all. I saw this tooth online labelled as Timurlengia euotica It probably is,I just wanted to check with you guys,for extra safety. The tooth was found in the Kyzylkum desert, North of the Uzbekistan. Here is the only picture I have. (Front and back of the tooth. Much appreciate it.
-
Here are my Uzbekistan theropod teeth, finally got the displays for them. The tooth in the gem jar in the lower left hand corner is likely a carcharodontosaurid. The teeth in the lower right hand corner have a round base and I'm not sure what they are. However those two teeth do bear a resemblance to Shaochilong. More studying will be required for those two teeth.
- 13 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- bisskety formation
- dinosaur teeth
- (and 1 more)
.jpg.7459b5ccf3a5701867b3f738eef17e73.jpg)
