msantix Posted December 1, 2019 Share Posted December 1, 2019 Hi, i asked previously about a couple of Pliosaur teeth which i now have, but there are these two other teeth from the Goulmima site in Morocco that look quite different and i was wondering if they could be Polycotylid teeth or from some other marine reptile. The first tooth is 6.2cm (2.44 inch) and the other tooth is 4.1cm (1.6 inch). Is it possible to narrow these teeth down when the enamel looks worn?. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msantix Posted December 3, 2019 Author Share Posted December 3, 2019 I guess i should ask does anyone have any pictures of Polycotildae teeth? or Libonectes (an Elasmosaur) teeth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Andy- Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Tooth 2 is definitely the pliosaur Brachauchenius lucasi As for tooth 1, it's lacking details but the size and robust-ness of the tooth makes it very likely pliosaur instead of polycotylid. For some reason I cannot fathom, Elasmosaur and Polycotylid teeth are very rare in Goulmima. This is a tooth in my collection that is most likely Polycotylidae due to its size, fine striations and curvature. I am not ruling out Libonectes however. 2 Looking forward to meeting my fellow Singaporean collectors! Do PM me if you are a Singaporean, or an overseas fossil-collector coming here for a holiday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msantix Posted December 3, 2019 Author Share Posted December 3, 2019 Wow! thanks for the help, i didn't realise that both teeth could be Pliosaur due to the preservation and lack of some diagnostic features like striations (although the size points to that direction). Interesting to hear that Elasmosaur & Polycotylid teeth are rarer, i don't have much of a clue about why that is since Elasmosaurs and Polycotylids probably outnumbered the Pliosaurs - maybe there is a collection bias? or something along those lines? That is a beautiful tooth you have there I think Polycotylid is a good guess for the id, the only Elasmosaur teeth i have seen are those common Zarafasaura teeth on the market and the tooth you have might be a good fit for Thililua or Manemergus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Andy- Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 50 minutes ago, msantix said: Wow! thanks for the help, i didn't realise that both teeth could be Pliosaur due to the preservation and lack of some diagnostic features like striations (although the size points to that direction). Interesting to hear that Elasmosaur & Polycotylid teeth are rarer, i don't have much of a clue about why that is since Elasmosaurs and Polycotylids probably outnumbered the Pliosaurs - maybe there is a collection bias? or something along those lines? That is a beautiful tooth you have there I think Polycotylid is a good guess for the id, the only Elasmosaur teeth i have seen are those common Zarafasaura teeth on the market and the tooth you have might be a good fit for Thililua or Manemergus. Tooth 1 could be a Polycotylidae in the Dolichorhynchops or Polycotylus family as their rooted teeth can be robust, but as far as I know, their roots are also recurved. Straight roots like tooth 1 are closer to pliosaur. Here are some examples of rooted Dolichorhynchops teeth: And some examples of rooted Polycotylus teeth: Yeah, it took me a while to find my tooth. I am surprised by the lack of Elasmosaur and Polycotylid teeth there. As far as I know, Polycotylids usually outnumber pliosaurs. Maybe it's due to pliosaur teeth being bigger and more visible to diggers? 1 Looking forward to meeting my fellow Singaporean collectors! Do PM me if you are a Singaporean, or an overseas fossil-collector coming here for a holiday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msantix Posted January 7, 2020 Author Share Posted January 7, 2020 Sorry to update a month old thread, but i just received the teeth and i have to say tooth 2 is very thin and quite small.....very different to the Pliosaur teeth i have. So i am thinking that tooth 2 instead could be from a Polycotylid instead of Pliosaur. Tooth 1 however is massive! (in comparison) it is very robust, and i am starting to be confident about labelling it as Pliosaur. I took some some photos to show the comparison This one shows my two Pliosaur teeth on the left Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now