Jim Kovalchick Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Over the holiday I examined some fossils found by my wife at Myrtle Beach over the last couple months. Here is one that I first thought was a cow shark tooth. Now I'm wondering if it is really a bramble shark tooth. The root is obviously gone. Could I get some opinions please? If this is a bramble, is it rarer than a cow? I already thought it was a decent find, but is it even more special? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandpa Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Try http://www.elasmo.com/frameMe.html?file=leecreek/sp_shrk1.html&menu=bin/menu_leecreek-alt.html http://aurorafossilmuseum.org/post/17/shark-tooth-identification.html https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/discover-fish/species-profiles/echinorhinus-brucus/ " Dentition The multicuspid teeth are similar in both jaws. Each is strongly compressed with a single cusp and up to three cusplets. These cusplets are lacking in juveniles. The teeth are curved toward the corners of the jaws, forming a cutting blade. The upper jaw contains 20-26 teeth while the lower jaw has 22-26 teeth. " And finally from our own TFF: I think NOT Bramble Shark - too many cuspids for one thiing. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Yeah, that looks like a partial Notorynchus lower anterlateral tooth. There's a chance it's a Hexanchus but Notorynchus is more likely. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Kovalchick Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 Ok. Thanks for responses. I saw some similarity to this picture of a modern bramble but I see that there are enough cow variants to classify it that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcoSr Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 It is always tough to id a shark tooth from pictures especially a broken/damaged tooth. However the unique features of your tooth do allow a reasonable id. The mesial cusplets of your tooth really help with an id. Your tooth is definitely not a bramble shark tooth. The mesial cusplets also seem to rule out a sixgill shark (Hexanchus sp.) tooth (see the pictures below of the dentitions of the extant Hexanchus griseus and Hexanchus nakamurai sharks from J-elasmo) . Based upon the mesial cusplets, it looks like a sevengill shark tooth. The cusplets actually look more like a Heptranchias (see the picture below from Bass 1975) but the widths of the 3 cones look much more like a Notorynchus (see the picture below of the extant Notorynchus cepedianus jaw from elasmo.com). So I agree with a Notorynchus id but I believe it is more likely to be an upper tooth. Hexanchus griseus Hexanchus nakamurai Heptranchias perlo Notorynchus cepedianus Marco Sr. 3 "Any day that you can fossil hunt is a great day." My family fossil website Some Of My Shark, Ray, Fish And Other Micros My Extant Shark Jaw Collection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now