Jump to content

Can Someone Help Identify What I Found?


Hollie

Recommended Posts

Hello All! I am new here, recommended to visit this site, for help Identifying what I found, by someone named The Fossil Guy, who I found on Facebook by following the site Fossilera. 
My name is Hollie and I am from Long Island, New York. The object in question that I need help identifying was found by myself about ten years ago on the north shore of Long Island in a town called Lloyd Harbor and on the beach. 
Long Island was formed by a glacier 13,000 ago and is a terminal moraine. The north shore beaches are very rocky with large glacial rocks everywhere and the south shore beaches are all sand. 
I was told by the fossil guy that my piece is an imprint of a mollusk or worm in sandstone. I am hopeful you all can give me an idea to what it may be. 
Thank you and happy holidays!!

9DBFB890-3AD9-4E62-B78B-A29225B4984E.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Forum, Hollie. :)

 

 I think this may be a piece of water eroded geology, and not a fossil.

The lack of symmetry to the deeper imprints remind me of Cone in Cone structures, rather than a bivalve, which would be much more symmetrical. 

Still looks like a very cool specimen.

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the symmetry doesn't really shout fossil. I can't quite see it being cone in cone though. The grain/texture in what remains seems wrong.

Are there any clues on the other side ?

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking something like a very water worn version of this:

 

cone_cone.jpg

 

image from HERE.

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice that these cones are in cones though. It would need to be the final cone, and somehow it seems too well defined for it to be.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just replied to this on the FF Facebook page, where there are more photos. It looks like it's weathered laminated sandstone, with the flats between the features caused by being ground and/or broken off.

5df8d1954550f_Screenshot2019-12-17at12_58_35.png.5a4d65367e2224cc7614ef3130a2befc.png

 

The back is less extreme:

5df8d19a524c6_Screenshot2019-12-17at12_59_07.thumb.png.545164444fd29115ad3d4cdef5e8dae0.png 

  • I found this Informative 3

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...