Jump to content

Hybodont?? New Jersey Cretaceous


frankh8147

Recommended Posts

Hello! 

 

I originally thought this was a Hybodont shark tooth when I found it (size is perfect) but I just realized that no other Hybodont tooth is my collection is curved like this. Is this possibly from a different part of the mouth or did I completely mid-label this one..

 

As always, all help is greatly appreciated!

@Carl

 

 

20191223_170800.jpg

20191223_170724.jpg

20191223_170459.jpg

20191223_165641.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Frank, I can't help with ID, I just wanted to say, you certainly find all the cool and unusual things.

  • I found this Informative 1

Dipleurawhisperer5.jpg          MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png

I like Trilo-butts and I cannot lie.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure what you have Frank, but I am fairly certain it is not a Hybodont tooth. I have 50 or more Meristodonoides novojerseyensis (same species as found in New Jersey) from 2 sites here in North Carolina where they are found and even the extremely worn ones are easily recognized as a Hybodont tooth.

  • I found this Informative 4

Bulldozers and dirt Bulldozers and dirt
behind the trailer, my desert
Them red clay piles are heaven on earth
I get my rocks off, bulldozers and dirt

Patterson Hood; Drive-By Truckers

 

image.png.0c956e87cee523facebb6947cb34e842.png May 2016  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png.b42a25e3438348310ba19ce6852f50c1.png May 2012 IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png.1721b8912c45105152ac70b0ae8303c3.png.2b6263683ee32421d97e7fa481bd418a.pngAug 2013, May 2016, Apr 2020 VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png.af5065d0585e85f4accd8b291bf0cc2e.png.72a83362710033c9bdc8510be7454b66.png.9171036128e7f95de57b6a0f03c491da.png Oct 2022

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a ray dermal denticle

  • I found this Informative 5

“You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, The Jersey Devil said:

It’s a ray dermal denticle

 

Yes, and it may be that rare form.  This one is angled higher than any I've seen from there before though I've seen only a couple.

 

@non-remanié

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well this just got cool! I don't have any even close to this big and robust. Here are typical examples.

 

Thanks everyone!

20191223_182924.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, siteseer said:

 

Yes, and it may be that rare form.  This one is angled higher than any I've seen from there before though I've seen only a couple.

 

@non-remanié

Hi Jess,

Are you talking about Peyeria? This one doesn't look like a typical Peyeria, more like a denticle from a different part of the ray.

  • I found this Informative 1

“You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/23/2019 at 4:18 PM, The Jersey Devil said:

Hi Jess,

Are you talking about Peyeria? This one doesn't look like a typical Peyeria, more like a denticle from a different part of the ray.

 

I don't think it's Peyeria either but it looks similar.  Peyeria has been called a dermal denticle or an odd rostral spine.  It seems more like a denticle, the Cretaceous version of what we see on modern rays.

 

One thing to consider is that Peyeria is known from the Cenomanian of Egypt and Morocco but the NJ material is about 30 million years younger and sclerorhychid rostral spines are known from both.  it's possible that Peyeria is a sclerorhynchid dermal denticle form with some variation between genera and belongs to Onchopristis in the Cenomanian and Ischyrhiza in the Campanian-Maastrichtian of NJ deposits.  I think you suggested that in another thread.

 

Jess

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/23/2019 at 6:33 PM, frankh8147 said:

..

20191223_183001.jpg

I'm guessing you know this already but of the 6 pieces on the bottom, 2 are dermal ossicles and the other 4 are broken chondrichthyan vertebrae.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Carl said:

I'm guessing you know this already but of the 6 pieces on the bottom, 2 are dermal ossicles and the other 4 are broken chondrichthyan vertebrae.

I actually never made that distinction so thank you! Clearly, I need to brush up on my Ray knowledge. :)

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, siteseer said:

 

I don't think it's Peyeria either but it looks similar.  Peyeria has been called a dermal denticle or an odd rostral spine.  It seems more like a denticle, the Cretaceous version of what we see on modern rays.

 

One thing to consider is that Peyeria is known from the Cenomanian of Egypt and Morocco but the NJ material is about 30 million years younger and sclerorhychid rostral spines are known from both.  it's possible that Peyeria is a sclerorhynchid dermal denticle form with some variation between genera and belongs to Onchopristis in the Cenomanian and Ischyrhiza in the Campanian-Maastrichtian of NJ deposits.  I think you suggested that in another thread.

 

Jess

 

I took a good look at it under magnification and am fairly certain it never had those ridges like I see on Peyeria so I think that should eliminate that possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...