Jump to content

Smilodon gracilis find


History Hunter02

Recommended Posts

In January 2019, I found this Smilodon gracilis partial left dentary in coastal South Carolina.  I am finally uploading it because it was finally positively identified by a paleontologist last week.  The m1 is complete, and the p4 is broken off, but the roots are still in the jaw fragment.  This was the smaller relative of Smilodon fatalis which only had a p4 and a m1 instead of a p3, p4, and m1 on the lower dentary.  Page 216 of The Fossil Vertebrates of Florida has a picture that is a perfect match.  This is definitely the best find in my collection (outdoing the Dire Wolf K9 from last December).

cropedsidejaw.jpg

jawsidecrop.jpg

topcrop.jpg

  • I found this Informative 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool find.  My toothless Smilodon jaw for comparison, Texas PF.

0968101F-A3F4-49B3-B5AE-4628B4380613.jpeg

0E1E73EA-1E99-46FE-8564-CAD4F010616E.jpeg

  • I found this Informative 4

Grüße,

Daniel A. Wöhr aus Südtexas

"To the motivated go the spoils."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very cool! Top level predators as always (by necessity) less common in ecosystems--and rarer to find in fossil form. Even the somewhat common megalodon teeth in Florida are way outnumbered by those of smaller sharks (and dugong bones). :P Other than the couple thousand saber-tooth cats that have been pulled from their sticky ends at the La Brea site, I know of no other place where fossils of large toothy cats occur in a frequency that could be called anything but very rare.

 

 

Cheers.

 

-Ken

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredible find and on many bucket lists for sure :wub: congrats :envy:

Every once in a great while it's not just a big rock down there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I think that is actually a rarer find than S. fatalis.  S. gracilis existed only in the Early Pleistocene with S. fatalis as its likely descendant.  I would say a lot more specimens of the latter have been found than the former even if you don't count stuff from the tar pits.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And going back to the early Pliocene epoch (late Hemphillian stage) or about 4.5 to 5 Ma, you have the proto saber-tooth cat (Rhizosmilodon fiteae) presently only known from Florida but expected elsewhere. The fact that these are rare finds means it will be some time before its range is expanded.

 

https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/florida-vertebrate-fossils/species/rhizosmilodon-fiteae

 

Cheers.

 

-Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, digit said:

And going back to the early Pliocene epoch (late Hemphillian stage) or about 4.5 to 5 Ma, you have the proto saber-tooth cat (Rhizosmilodon fiteae) presently only known from Florida but expected elsewhere. The fact that these are rare finds means it will be some time before its range is expanded.

 

https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/florida-vertebrate-fossils/species/rhizosmilodon-fiteae

 

Cheers.

 

-Ken

It does look very similar, but the deposit does not date back that far.  It is only Pleistocene (at least of what we know.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...