Jump to content

I believe that this is just geology, but would like a second opinion.


turtlefoot

Recommended Posts

I am assuming that this feature is just geology, but I would like a second opinion on this if possible.  My eyes do wonders at seeing what I want to see instead of what is actually there.  Thank you.  This was found in Douglas County, Missouri, USA in the Roubidoux Formation.  The feature in question measures 84x31mm.  The host rock is 20x12.5cm.  It was found near a seasonal creek bed where gastropods, rugose coral and crinoids have been found.  Numerous trace fossils have been found in the area also.  Thank you for your time and help.

geology001.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may have been something at one time, but if it was a fossil, it is long past holding any detail.  :unsure: 

Probably just geologic in nature, though.

  • I found this Informative 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically, if you can't tell it doesn't matter.

Other than to indicate that a closer look in these rocks is in order that is. 

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks.  I completely understand the concept of "if you can't tell, it doesn't matter".  It makes a lot of sense to me.  

 

29 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

It may have been something at one time, but if it was a fossil, it is long past holding any detail.  :unsure: 

Probably just geologic in nature, though.

If this was a fossil, is there any chance of detail on the side that is still embedded in the rock?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, turtlefoot said:

Thanks.  I completely understand the concept of "if you can't tell, it doesn't matter".  It makes a lot of sense to me.  

 

If this was a fossil, is there any chance of detail on the side that is still embedded in the rock?

Possibly.  But I don't know how you would be able to get it out of the rock .  :shrug:

Probably just geologic, though. 

 

  • I found this Informative 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, turtlefoot said:

Thanks.  I completely understand the concept of "if you can't tell, it doesn't matter".  It makes a lot of sense to me.  

 

If this was a fossil, is there any chance of detail on the side that is still embedded in the rock?

When in doubt grab a bigger hammer. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Rockwood said:

When in doubt grab a bigger hammer. ;)

And if it's something worth pursuing there should be more where that one came from, and probably in better condition.

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...