Jump to content

? hexagonaria quadrigemina ?


Heiner

Recommended Posts

Hello members of this forum,

I just signed here and would apriciate to profit from all this knowledge here.

Even if I was a heavy fossil collector as a kid I don‘t know much about it, but it still affects me if I see something interesting.

Like some time ago I bought a small side table with an interesting stone plate on it. The backside shows some engravings what I think is the explenation to the front side fossil. Unfortunately it‘s hard to read in some parts .

I think that the fossil could show some hexagonaria quadrigemina Corals? Fond 1966 in the region of the Eifel wich is close to me living in Belgium.

Can you help?
Thanks a lot!
 

1889DD5F-0392-4915-8B4F-893493071597.jpeg

E77D14E1-40D0-4DA0-B612-1BA7B4042B43.jpeg

C379AC72-46A8-4173-AB05-A22CC412DED6.jpeg

52354EED-F1D9-48EE-BD3E-B771FF04831E.jpeg

0018C0DB-497E-4123-9B81-E338F438AEB6.jpeg

A25B93E1-F2DF-43EF-9DA3-D9B1EB3329A6.jpeg

39C0E40E-AACF-4471-92FB-ED44273347E1.jpeg

634D8A52-5F53-45AF-A2D7-8454F2EC378F.jpeg

C9DF2D76-C357-4AA8-B753-B899DCA43A6D.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks more like the cross section of a Favosites (an extinct genus of tabulate coral) not a Hexagonaria (a genus of colonial rugose coral). Mislabeled in my opinion. 

Many times I've wondered how much there is to know.  
led zeppelin

 

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png IPFOTM.png IPFOTM2.png IPFOTM3.png IPFOTM4.png IPFOTM5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mikeymig said:

Looks more like the cross section of a Favosites (an extinct genus of tabulate coral) not a Hexagonaria (a genus of colonial rugose coral). Mislabeled in my opinion. 

I would have to disagree,

The coral very much does look like hexagonaria in my opinion as there are visible septa on the close-up of the fossil which favosites lack.

I would also expect less variation in thickness and visible tabulae for favosites which I cannot see here.

A higher resolution would certainly help, but from what I can see now the original ID seems good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...or maybe this one in a higher resolution? 

Also anybody knows about the meaning of the name on the plate? I suppose that it means Jean de Heinzelin de Breaucourt who seems to be a known geologist. Is maybe the history of the fossil connected to his work? 

 

36C6C2DB-5348-400D-9EE1-742100DB4E38.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Heiner said:

Is maybe the history of the fossil connected to his work? 

I don´t totally understand your question but this coral species was described in 1820.

Jean de Heinzelin de Breaucourt seems to have lived in the 20th century.

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not entirely clear, but I think I can some dissepiments in some of the corallites.  If so, this would rule out Favosites and favor Hexagonaria. However a definitive ID would need a transverse section to show cross sections (as opposed to longitudinal sections) of the corallites.

 

Also I think this is the most unusual method of labeling a specimen that I have ever seen.

 

Don

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...