Jump to content

dbrake40

Recommended Posts

Found by my buddy on a river gravel bar/bank in southern Minnesota. As I've stated in some previous posts the geology in our area is upper Cretaceous. However, the river where this specimen was found pulse floods and is like a giant gravel mixer. In the past and more recently Pleistocene fossils have been found in the river gravel deposits in my area (mammoth, bison, etc). It general it is very difficult to age by geology/context. I'm hoping ancient horse but more sets of eyes on it are better. What do you think and thanks!? Any thoughts on age? Ancient horse or not?

 

 

Horse1.jpg

Horse2.jpg

Horse3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Harry Pristis said:

Yes, Equus sp. -- a lower,  left m1 or m2.

Any guess on age? Looks partially fossilized to me...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dbrake40 said:

ny guess on age? Looks partially fossilized to me...

 You can do the hot needle test. If you put the hot tip of a needle to modern bone, it smells bad. Fossilized bone doesn't smell.

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt

 

-Mark Twain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not the hot needle test, given that it is unlikely you can keep a needle hot enough to perform it. Use something like a butane lighter which would be a sustained heat source.

  • I found this Informative 1

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Kane said:

Not the hot needle test, given that it is unlikely you can keep a needle hot enough to perform it. Use something like a butane lighter which would be a sustained heat source.

I've heard burn tests don't work so well on teeth but I'll maybe try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve heard it won’t work on teeth at all given that there is little collagen. Could someone verify the failure of a burn test on teeth? @Harry Pristis

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The burn test works on collagen which gives off a nasty smell when burned. 

Teeth contain very little collagen, so the test isn't very useful. 

 

Teeth are mostly made of hydroxyapatite which doesn't burn, I don't think. 

  • I found this Informative 2

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Kane said:

I’ve heard it won’t work on teeth at all given that there is little collagen. Could someone verify the failure of a burn test on teeth? @Harry Pristis

@JohnJ recently spoke of the hot needle test in the post below. Saying the test is not a valid one on bone as you would need a continuous heat source to effectively burn collagen. A clean specimen would also be needed (I’m assuming to rule out false positives from contaminants).

 

If teeth have little to no collagen as @Tidgy's Dad Adam says, it would stand to reason that it would be doubly difficult, if possible at all.

 

 

  • I found this Informative 3

The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.  -Neil deGrasse Tyson

 

Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...