andy_mnemonic Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Hello TFF! I found these two pieces in Nevada while looking for some Carboniferous shark teeth and hope I found one. They were located in the Bird Spring Formation north of Vegas which is Pennsylvanian in age. #1 and #2 which could just as well be a brachiopod... Thanks for looking! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petalodus12 Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 The first looks like a possible cladodont and the second looks like a brachiopod. I’d wait for a second and more experienced opinion though. Nice finds! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 @jdp Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connorp Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Some more pictures of #1 would help. #2 is a spiriferid brachiopod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdp Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 So that's Mississippian-Pennsylvanian boundary, and is more or less equivalent to the Surprise Canyon fauna: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/carboniferous-chondrichthyan-assemblages-from-the-surprise-canyon-and-watahomigi-formations-latest-mississippianearly-pennsylvanian-of-the-western-grand-canyon-northern-arizona/6756DFC72DBDDA2ACB99D00D3D072DF6/core-reader?fbclid=IwAR0E1psGBZSGgC_DxRtzZOli5BpBNBvgML8blP5bFPd8ePO49lRhwdYywfc I do think your suspicions are correct and the second fossil is brachiopod, but the first is definitely vertebrate. I can't say with certainty, because it is not fully prepared. A little bit of white vinegar might remove the surrounding matrix if it is limestone. If it's dolomite, that may not work. From what I can see, it looks a little like the xenacanth Hokomata (see linked paper, figure 4:5-7) or like the denticles of cf. Hamiltonichthys (see linked paper, figure 9:28-29). But I have also seen chondrichthyan gill rakers that look like that. More prep would help. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_mnemonic Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 @jdp I gave it the vinegar treatment and this is what it looks like now. I didn't think the vinegar would alter the fossil but it looks like it has taken a bit of it but exposed a bit more as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now