The Jersey Devil Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Hi everyone, I would like to ask about some brownies beach shells and corals from a while back. I think the first 3 pics including the corals and Scaphopod are modern, but I want to make sure before I discard them. The last two pics seem like fossils - is there an ID? Thanks! Modern??: Fossil??: 2 “You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldigger Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Pictures not showing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hokietech96 Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 I see them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey P Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Those all look like typical Calvert marine fossils to me, the oyster, Pycnodonte percrassa. The corals are definitely fossils and it looks like you have a partial tusk shell, Dentalium attenuatum. Calvert Miocene shells can fool us into thinking they're modern because they usually have original shell material. I wouldn't discard those. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jersey Devil Posted April 19, 2020 Author Share Posted April 19, 2020 25 minutes ago, Jeffrey P said: Those all look like typical Calvert marine fossils to me, the oyster, Pycnodonte percrassa. The corals are definitely fossils and it looks like you have a partial tusk shell, Dentalium attenuatum. Calvert Miocene shells can fool us into thinking they're modern because they usually have original shell material. I wouldn't discard those. Interesting. I knew some of them were fossils because they have matrix attached but others I thought were modern. Is the dentalium also fossil? Do you know what the fossil scallop species is? The corals are actually from Flag ponds. I’ll have to sort them out. “You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey P Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Dentalium would also be a fossil. The scallop shell is a Chesapecten. I'm not sure what species. Chesapeake Bay is primarily freshwater so it supports a lower diversity of mollusk species. Back in Miocene times however, the coastline was further west and north and this was a marine environment. The climate was milder too, more like Florida, hence the corals. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 10 minutes ago, The Jersey Devil said: Do you know what the fossil scallop species is? Do it your self kit from the Museum there. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jersey Devil Posted April 19, 2020 Author Share Posted April 19, 2020 Thanks guys. Here is another curiosity from Matoaka Cabins. I think it’s a sand dollar, don’t know if it’s IDable though. “You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 19 minutes ago, The Jersey Devil said: Here is another curiosity from Matoaka Cabins. Abertalla aberti 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jersey Devil Posted May 1, 2020 Author Share Posted May 1, 2020 @Jeffrey P @Rockwood I thought these were modern because they’re really light, what do you think? Also seem a little too well preserved. “You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fossilnut Posted May 1, 2020 Share Posted May 1, 2020 To me they appear to be fossil fish vertebrae. Modern one would be whitish in color. Excellently preserved. Note hand held is difficult to see. Photos on a plane background better light would aid in iD. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jersey Devil Posted May 1, 2020 Author Share Posted May 1, 2020 3 hours ago, fossilnut said: To me they appear to be fossil fish vertebrae. Modern one would be whitish in color. Excellently preserved. Note hand held is difficult to see. Photos on a plane background better light would aid in iD. Can the maryland ones be very light/not dense? “You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted May 2, 2020 Share Posted May 2, 2020 16 hours ago, The Jersey Devil said: I thought these were modern because they’re really light, what do you think? Also seem a little too well preserved. Fish bone is not as heavy as say the fossil marine mammal bones found there. Modern bone does stain dark in the bay because of the ironstone present though. These appear to be fossils. But if they seem pliable at all I might have to change that opinion. A tooth tap test may be informative. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jersey Devil Posted May 3, 2020 Author Share Posted May 3, 2020 19 hours ago, Rockwood said: Fish bone is not as heavy as say the fossil marine mammal bones found there. Modern bone does stain dark in the bay because of the ironstone present though. These appear to be fossils. But if they seem pliable at all I might have to change that opinion. A tooth tap test may be informative. They’re as light as I would expect a modern one to be. They also have a bit of white showing I think. “You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jersey Devil Posted May 3, 2020 Author Share Posted May 3, 2020 @MarcoSr Do you possibly have any insight on these fish vertebrae? Are modern stained vertebrae found pretty often at the cliffs? “You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 As distasteful as it is, you may have to burn test it. You know, the old stink check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcoSr Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 6 hours ago, The Jersey Devil said: @MarcoSr Do you possibly have any insight on these fish vertebrae? Are modern stained vertebrae found pretty often at the cliffs? Modern fish bony parts stain very quickly brown to black. Typically if you see any white at all they are modern. If they are soft, pliable and light weight they are modern. Usually modern fish bones retain a smell for a good while. Put them right up to your nose and smell them. If there is any odor at all they are modern. From the below picture, the first vertebra looks modern. The second like it could be fossilized. Marco Sr. 1 "Any day that you can fossil hunt is a great day." My family fossil website Some Of My Shark, Ray, Fish And Other Micros My Extant Shark Jaw Collection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now