Jump to content

fosssilfan

Recommended Posts

Hello!  I am new to the forum, and this is my first time posting.

 

Today I was at Moolack Beach on the Oregon Coast (part of the Astoria formation, I think), and I found something I hadn’t seen before.  I found it in the surf.  Attached are multiple photographs.  Please forgive the zoom/occasional blurriness.  The fossil seems to be about 10cm (~4in) long, and 5.5cm (~2in) wide at the wider end.  
 

Thank you for checking it out!

 

 

E13A802A-2E9C-4C1A-B799-1245E5CD5E28.jpeg

F2C2BD7B-D128-406F-A416-5BF0F707B6D8.jpeg

734A574C-3DCC-40B6-A642-9E48361F23FF.jpeg

2C69FBA7-455D-46D6-B2B3-145586F8148B.jpeg

27BF53D7-8D73-41B0-A0A4-AD33167FDB2D.jpeg

1CAD9AD6-8C21-4453-B869-87A0634C477A.jpeg

986F0F7B-B078-4130-A771-F0A2DC476A33.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi GeschWhat, thank you for taking the time to look at my post!  :)
I’ll post a few side photographs.

image.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a chunk of bone in a concretion, to me. 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Fossildude19 for taking a look at it!  :)

 

GeschWhat, here are two photos in different angles of that same spot, with better lighting:

 

 

 

 

4F50A701-C60F-48C1-BCB4-186B5AA63780.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

fosssilfan,

welcome to the forum. definitely fossilized bone in a worn concretion typical of the Astoria formation. it's so worn identifying it is challenging. if I had it in hand and had some time to contemplate it I might grok it. the cell structure appears to be mammalian as opposed to the large fish species found in the Astoria. one of the more common vertebrate fossils found at moolack are cetacean vertebrae. my best guess is it's a highly worn whale vertebrae sans the body with only bits of processes remaining. the thin cross section of bone, the size, and hints of thicker associated or connected bone kind of narrows it down to, vertebrae with their transverse processes and neural spines, skulls, and maybe scapula. the size indicates it's too big for dolphins and pinnipeds. that leaves rare desmostylians, even rarer terrestrial mammals, or cetaceans. really a wag on my part and i could be completely wrong. I'm not a paleontologist but I've done field work along that stretch of beach with some very accomplished ones. hope that helps.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another possibility is that this is a sliver of baleen whale rostrum, not an infrequent discovery in the Astoria Fm.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

good catch. a definite possibility. i have even seen highly worn examples of fossilized baleen from the formation. a lot of mysticete material along that stretch of beach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...