Jump to content

Notidanodon

Recommended Posts

Hi guys the info I know is on the label. :)

However, I happen to know that Lucina concinna (deshayes 1857?) isn’t valid, 

so I looked up the replacement name which is Rugalucina cracentis but it looks nothing like it.

I think the label is wrong. Any help would be great, thanks. :)

Also calling our resident bivalve specialist @Max-fossils

A777D25D-4E8C-463C-B54C-F4FD8B294C8F.jpeg

61C718D3-80FB-4A43-818A-675A162EF5F4.jpeg

B9767233-ED43-43C4-B353-7C87DD75764F.jpeg

4943D8F0-C80C-402D-BFB2-20510E043E3A.jpeg

0A532363-61D1-404E-BC50-59DC1EC36936.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This website lists a similar pelecypod as Lucina miniscula.

 

lucina.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Fossildude19 said:

This website lists a similar pelecypod as Lucina miniscula.

 

lucina.jpg

Thanks;) that looks right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...