thezenroom Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 Found in lake erie ontario, 10 inches long. Any help would be super welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TqB Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 (edited) Welcome to the forum! It's a fine longitudinal section of a rugose coral ("horn coral"). Looks like a cystiphyllid, such as this Silurian Cystiphyllum - someone who knows the area can probably say for sure. Edited June 27, 2020 by TqB 5 Tarquin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 50 minutes ago, TqB said: ("horn coral") This, like specimens I've collected, seems more tubular than horn shaped. Is that just an individual variation related to local conditions ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TqB Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Rockwood said: This, like specimens I've collected, seems more tubular than horn shaped. Is that just an individual variation related to local conditions ? "Horn corals" can get very long in, as you say, the right conditions. The huge Siphonophyllia specimens at Serpent Rock in Co. Sligo are a good example. 3 Tarquin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 I wonder if they had the equivalent of ears and noses that did keep growing bigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilNerd Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 I have seen solitary rugose “horn” coral at the Falls of the Ohio State Park in Indiana that were about a meter long with calyx as big as my fist. They get even larger with some reports suggesting almost double that size. Siphonophrentis and Scenophyllum are examples of genus found there that get rather large. 3 The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. -Neil deGrasse Tyson Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 1 hour ago, FossilNerd said: genus found there Just a note for beginners: This implies that a selective pressure toward larger coralite size was in place for a considerable amount of time in human terms. As opposed to it being where specimens just happened to find a lot of food. The elongated tube form I suspect is more the result of a coral animal that tended to have a long life span. @TqB ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TqB Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 23 minutes ago, Rockwood said: Just a note for beginners: This implies that a selective pressure toward larger coralite size was in place for a considerable amount of time in human terms. As opposed to it being where specimens just happened to find a lot of food. The elongated tube form I suspect is more the result of a coral animal that tended to have a long life span. @TqB ? Unless conditions were poor, I think the large diameter (i.e. maturity) of a large species was reached quite quickly. Then a long, cylindrical section could develop if conditions remained equable. But I don't know if any studies have been done on rugose life span, although it should be possible from growth lines. 3 Tarquin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 14 minutes ago, TqB said: (i.e. maturity) That's the key to understanding the cone - tube distinction. You need the early years. A bad spell could appear as a reverse cone in an incomplete specimen. There is still a discrete limit on size within taxonomic sets in some way ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TqB Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Rockwood said: That's the key to understanding the cone - tube distinction. You need the early years. A bad spell could appear as a reverse cone in an incomplete specimen. There is still a discrete limit on size within taxonomic sets in some way ? Of course, as with virtually all organisms, mostly genetic presumably. Collections show this, but there's always the chance of a rare extra large find! And theoretical immortality is possible, as with the "immortal jellyfish", a not too distant relative of the corals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turritopsis_dohrnii 1 Tarquin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 Sometimes I don't know if I'm coming or going, but that's ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now