Jump to content

Some more new footprints


RetiredLawyer

Recommended Posts

The first picture looks like a different print than what I’ve found before - the toes are much wider spread than the chirotherium and there seems to be only three toes, not four. The second picture shows an interesting pattern in the rock. The third has front and rear prints. 

B3BA1E10-7FAC-4E8C-A625-DA627B82E8A8.jpeg

229A4A2F-AB24-4A2F-83A3-896E7D447720.jpeg

DB1ED073-0159-4CFB-8152-31BA31FC1C9B.jpeg

03CF04DB-29AC-4652-BBB5-295C9AE8501A.jpeg

74F1612B-3AFD-439E-A42C-37EED8528653.jpeg

ABFB4F0A-CB7B-4E9E-9F0E-9C73F6F796E7.jpeg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, you find some cool stuff!

Thanks for posting it!. :) 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RetiredLawyer said:

The first picture looks like a different print than what I’ve found before - the toes are much wider spread than the chirotherium and there seems to be only three toes, not four. The second picture shows an interesting pattern in the rock. The third has front and rear prints. 

 

229A4A2F-AB24-4A2F-83A3-896E7D447720.jpeg

Very nice. Have any of the professional paleontologists taken a look yet?
 

The second photo looks like a plant.  What is the scale?

 

Here is a paper that talks about the Moenkopi fossils. If you sign up for JSTOR you can look at this one and up to 100 papers a month. 

Morales, M. (1987). Terrestrial Fauna and Flora from the Triassic Moenkopi Formation of the Southwestern United States. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science, 22(1), 1-19. Retrieved July 29, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/40024380

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If possible, y'oughta take the photos with low angle light coming from the upper left.  It is really hard to see the prints in straight-on lighting, esp that first one.  Just a thought.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RetiredLawyer said:

The first picture looks like a different print than what I’ve found before - the toes are much wider spread than the chirotherium and there seems to be only three toes, not four. The second picture shows an interesting pattern in the rock. The third has front and rear prints. 

B3BA1E10-7FAC-4E8C-A625-DA627B82E8A8.jpeg  229A4A2F-AB24-4A2F-83A3-896E7D447720.jpeg  DB1ED073-0159-4CFB-8152-31BA31FC1C9B.jpeg

03CF04DB-29AC-4652-BBB5-295C9AE8501A.jpeg  74F1612B-3AFD-439E-A42C-37EED8528653.jpeg  ABFB4F0A-CB7B-4E9E-9F0E-9C73F6F796E7.jpeg

I spoke to Spencer Lucas after I sent him a bunch of the pictures. He was excited about them but he’s locked down due to the virus. He’d like to come out to take a look when he’s allowed to travel again. In the second picture the scaly part is about 3-4 inches long. I can’t find it right now to measure it exactly - it is in there somewhere (see picture). 
 

Thank you for the references!

3A3FD230-6AEE-4D6A-AAB7-EBDFA226E52C.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...