Wrangellian Posted July 31, 2020 Share Posted July 31, 2020 Came across this one and wondered if it was fake or doctored. I have my suspicions - for one, the legs look disproportionate, but I wouldn't know. I wouldn't mind having one of these if it's real and the price is right. This is the only pic available... maybe not big enough to tell anything for sure? but I know some of you have a pretty good eye! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntonia Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 Not my area but it looks fishy to me. @Crazyhen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 The feet look a bit big, and the skull doesn't look correct. Either bad prepping or enhancements. hard to tell - so little detail in these photos. . 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FFF Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 (edited) Seen quite a few, they don't usually have much work done on them. Edited August 1, 2020 by FFF 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indominus rex Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 Have you got better pictures? Chinese Keichousaurus fossils are rarely faked as they are super common, occasionally they have a bit of work done to them because not all chinese fossil dealers can afford to buy air scribes. So most specimens are acid prepped. 1 Life started in the ocean. And so did my interest in fossils. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 8 hours ago, indominus rex said: Have you got better pictures? Chinese Keichousaurus fossils are rarely faked as they are super common, occasionally they have a bit of work done to them because not all chinese fossil dealers can afford to buy air scribes. So most specimens are acid prepped. Actually, most of them are prepped with rotary tools, like wire brush attachments. That is what is responsible for the harsh looks and worn away bones on these. Acid prepping takes a long time, and while some are done this way, the majority of them are ground down with rotary tools. 3 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrangellian Posted August 2, 2020 Author Share Posted August 2, 2020 OK, thanks everyone. I won't bother with this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazyhen Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 Looks to me a genuine specimen. Acid and mechanically prepped, and poorly prepped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 On 8/1/2020 at 5:56 AM, indominus rex said: Chinese Keichousaurus fossils are rarely faked as they are super common, occasionally they have a bit of work done to them because not all chinese fossil dealers can afford to buy air scribes. On 8/1/2020 at 2:15 PM, Fossildude19 said: Actually, most of them are prepped with rotary tools, like wire brush attachments. That is what is responsible for the harsh looks and worn away bones on these. Acid prepping takes a long time, and while some are done this way, the majority of them are ground down with rotary tools. Though I've also heard that they're super-common, I think this statement should be moderated somewhat in that they might indeed be super-common, just not all very qualitative. Between the bad prepping - indeed using rotary tools - and just the fact that the fossil was not particularly well-preserved to start off with, you end up with a lot of specimens, just not too many high (or even decent) quality ones. Local preparators have a number of tricks up their sleeves to increase the visual appeal and completeness of these fossils, such as sculpting missing parts out of rock and applying paint to highlight these newly created or otherwise missing features. These are the two "enhancements" I've most frequently seen. And though these tricks are common in the fossil preparation trade in general, it is the amount of time, effort and attention (or rather lack thereof) that comes with the high throughput production of these fossils that makes them less qualitative compared to one prepped by a more skilled preparator. In general, for these kinds of fossils: the greater and more anatomically correct the visible detail, the higher quality the prep-job. Though more expensive, these pieces are easier to judge for authenticity, as with lower-quality work it can be hard to tell whether inconsistencies are just poorly prepped parts or are covering up for some defect or another. You can then apply this same approach to individual parts of a specimen as well to see which parts may be authentic and which may have been tempered with. When asking for feedback on authenticity of Keichousaurus hui fossils it's therefore key to post clear and high-quality photographs, preferably including close-up shots of different parts of the specimen as well. In this particular case, though, I'd say the specimen looks to be authentic. The head seems a bit over-prepped, but the neck seems in order. The tail-ending has been almost prepared away, but it's mid-section seems fine. Similarly, the extremities seem to be okay, but the digits (especially on the left-hand side) seem over-prepared - as may some of the lower arm/leg bones and hand and feet bones, if these haven't been "enhanced". I'm less sure about the torso (or part of the body and tail with ribs attached), as they generally seem to have the right shape, but bone colour seems to be missing in spots. Could be bad prep, or could be some sculpting going on - though the specimen doesn't appear to have been painted on. Overall, I'd say not a bad specimen - a genuine one at least 'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bguild Posted August 6, 2020 Share Posted August 6, 2020 Hard to tell from the single photo, but to me it looks genuine, but with restoration as a result of quick/poor prep. The bottom half of the tail was almost prepped off and in a similar fashion, I’d say anything beyond the wrists was worn off and added in. The feet and digits don’t look right. Wouldn’t be surprised if there was some touching up of the mid section either. Bones towards the top of the tail look painted and the ribs/spine look a little too solid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeon.rocks Posted August 6, 2020 Share Posted August 6, 2020 Quote Though I've also heard that they're super-common, I think this statement should be moderated somewhat in that they might indeed be super-common, just not all very qualitative. Between the bad prepping - indeed using rotary tools - and just the fact that the fossil was not particularly well-preserved to start off with, you end up with a lot of specimens, just not too many high (or even decent) quality ones. ... While that's true for all fossils, that doesn't change the fact that most of them are prepped fast commercially. Mehanicaly, with scribes and rotary tools. Acid prep takes too long. Since common, there's a good share of well preserved ones found. But yes I agree: "bad prep" can have many reasons! Some of the best prepped fossils are often very easy to prep, not always - but have you ever seen a professionally bad preped GRF fish? With the right tools and an experienced preparator, it's impossible to prep a GRF fish bad, even if done commercially fast... Of course there are differences how well articulated or how deep in the layer (similar as 18. layer GRF fish, although GRF is easier) or if complete (or bad break) these Keichos are found etc. - but the best prepped ones are from the "softer layer" and usually split on the top of the plate, the ones in "harder layers" or deeper in matrix can require more time, are more sticky, there's less contrast, w/ similar hardness of matrix and bones, therefore not as nice to work with as the ones in softer shale (on the other hand softer shale requires "more care"), or would require a lot more time to prep decent - that's why grinded with rotary tools... I believe this one is from the harder layer, was split just on top however... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now