Jump to content

Possible hyphalosaurus, heavily restored


JohnBurrows

Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

 

First post on this forum. 

 

I recently purchased a collection of fossils from an estate, which were largely unlabelled. This wasn't an issue for the majority, basic Ammonites, etc. 
However, this was an interesting piece. I've had a look at it under a USB scope, it looks like it might be real but very heavily restored. However, I'm not an expert on these by any means. 

I originally thought it might have been a small Keichousaurus, but Hyphalosaurus seems to be a closer match. 

 

Would anyone have an idea on the identity, and any input on whether or not it is genuine? 

 

Thank you,

John

IMG_1358.JPG

IMG_1359.JPG

IMG_1361.JPG

IMG_1362.JPG

IMG_1364.JPG

IMG_1365.JPG

WIN_20200711_17_53_43_Pro.jpg

WIN_20200711_17_53_48_Pro.jpg

WIN_20200711_17_54_17_Pro.jpg

WIN_20200711_17_54_29_Pro.jpg

WIN_20200711_17_54_43_Pro.jpg

WIN_20200711_17_54_50_Pro.jpg

WIN_20200711_17_55_23_Pro.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me this actually looks like a real specimen. Don't see any red flags but let's wait for some more people to give their opinions.

 

Your ID also seems to be correct. Nice piece.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hyphalosaurus and genuine (ok, some restorations, but it is hard to get a fossil from China without any restorations).

  • I found this Informative 1

Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes (Confucius, 551 BC - 479 BC).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, oilshale said:

Hyphalosaurus and genuine (ok, some restorations, but it is hard to get a fossil from China without any restorations).

 

4 hours ago, gigantoraptor said:

To me this actually looks like a real specimen. Don't see any red flags but let's wait for some more people to give their opinions.

 

Your ID also seems to be correct. Nice piece.

Appreciate the input both! Thank you. 

Hyphalosaurus is a new one for me - not had one of these before. Perhaps a Keichosaurus next time.. 

Edited by JohnBurrows
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnBurrows said:

Hyphalosaurus is a new one for me - not had one of these before. Perhaps a Keichosaurus next time.. 

 

Actually there are two species: Hyphalosaurus baitaigouensis and Hyphalosaurus lingyuanensis, which differ e.g. in the number of cervical vertebrae. A detailed description can be found here: 

 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5339479_Osteology_and_taxonomic_revision_of_Hyphalosaurus_Diapsida_Choristodera_from_the_Lower_Cretaceous_of_Liaoning_China

Be glad - Hyphalosaurus is rarer than Keichousaurus.

Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes (Confucius, 551 BC - 479 BC).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...