Praefectus Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 A response to Woodward et. al 2020's refutation of Nanotyrannus. Argues that specimens BMRP 2002.4.1 and BMRP 2006.4.4 fall outside the growth curve of Tyrannosaurus. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/1/eaax6250/tab-e-letters 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Science Advances eLetters are not citable publications; they are not given DOIs and are not indexed in search engines such as Medline. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marumo Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 The paper looks like an interesting read, will give the response a read, but I'll take it with a pinch of salt until there's a published response. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now