fifbrindacier Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 Hi everybody, Dimitris sent me some nice stuff and I'd like your opinion about them. A cretaceous ammonite, maybe protetragonites An Oxfordo-callovian one Rynchonellids from the Trias of the Nechinska bara river That rudist from the Maastritchian of Mont Ptoon, Grèce. 1 "On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry) "We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes." In memory of Doren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 I'm not sure I can see rudists there. " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fifbrindacier Posted September 20, 2020 Author Share Posted September 20, 2020 I agree it might be something else, i don't see the three "columns" that can usually be seen when seen in cross-section. But i have doubts. "On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry) "We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes." In memory of Doren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 Rhynchonellids are often a nightmare to id, but i think those are Jurassic Lacunosella. Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fifbrindacier Posted September 20, 2020 Author Share Posted September 20, 2020 Thank you very much Adam. 1 "On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry) "We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes." In memory of Doren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 24 minutes ago, fifbrindacier said: I agree it might be something else, i don't see the three "columns" that can usually be seen when seen in cross-section. But i have doubts. Pictures 7,8,9 suggest rudist. I could bet on this. (not pictures 3,4) I think, I receive tooo late the updates, or I' m too slow. 1 " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fifbrindacier Posted September 21, 2020 Author Share Posted September 21, 2020 After talking to Dimitris about the ammonites i have rectifications to bring : they all come from the Zimevitsa plateau in Bulgaria and he said he collected them at the limit between Jurassic and Triassic layers. He hesitates between the Gintsi and the Radomir formations. To me the first one looks like an Oppelid. file:///C:/Users/acer/Downloads/Zimevitsa_GBGA_2014.pdf http://www.bgd.bg/CONFERENCES/Geonauki_2014/Sbornik/pdf/26_Metodiev_GeoSci_2014.pdf https://www.bgd.bg/CONFERENCES/Geonauki_2017/Sbornik/pdf/37_Metodiev_GeoSci_2017.pdf http://www.bgd.bg/CONFERENCES/Geonauki_2015/Sbornik/pdf/48_Metodiev_GEOSCIENCES_2015.pdf "On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry) "We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes." In memory of Doren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now