Tidgy's Dad Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 From Morocco World News : https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2020/10/322754/france-returns-25500-rare-artifacts-fossils-to-morocco/ 4 Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 Ammonites? Trilobites? Fish teeth? Seems like a potentially profitable racket: sell common fossils to unsuspecting foreigners; seize fossils and return them to Morocco; re-sell to more unsuspecting foreigners; seize fossils; re-re-sell... Of course before long no-one will buy, and all the people who dig/prep/sell will be out of a job. Don 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kikokuryu Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 There seems to be an explicit focus on fossils and there are cross links in the article to other Moroccan fossil controversies. I'm not familiar at all with the case, so call be ignorant, but I feel like the archeological artifacts were the issue, and not the trilobites and teeth. Not sure if this should be taken as a bad omen, or the article is just trying to capitalize on private collecting debate as it's fresh in people's minds via T-rex. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paleoworld-101 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 I don't understand what the basis was for returning these fossils, as opposed to the many thousands (millions?) of Moroccan fossils that get exported and sold in rock shops across the world. What's the difference? 1 "In Africa, one can't help becoming caught up in the spine-chilling excitement of the hunt. Perhaps, it has something to do with a memory of a time gone by, when we were the prey, and our nights were filled with darkness..." -Eternal Enemies: Lions And Hyenas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolmt Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 This is very alarming...Great way to kill the Moroccan fossil tourist industry. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kikokuryu Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Paleoworld-101 said: I don't understand what the basis was for returning these fossils, as opposed to the many thousands (millions?) of Moroccan fossils that get exported and sold in rock shops across the world. What's the difference? A lot of context is missing in this article in regards to the incident itself leaving the reader to guess what went on at French customs 15 years ago. It may have been a lack of declaration at customs and the fossils were seized due to the lack of proof of purchase and what not. I think this was the case with that recent incident in Spain? Why did they decide to return the fossils now? Who knows, perhaps a show of good faith to show support of Moroccan heritage movements while tensions are still high with private collections. I wish they had pictures of the "illicitly trafficked" fossils. The way the notable specimens are described, I can't imagine it being valuable. If it was a thousand Flexicalymeme, janky looking Spino and Onchopristis teeth, and a Mosasuchus abomination, then it's less likely that the value/importance of the fossils themselves were the reason for repatriation. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Praefectus Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Kikokuryu said: janky looking Spino and Onchopristis teeth, and a Mosasuchus abomination Hey, a lot of hard work goes into making those fossils! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 Some Moroccan "fossils" are more "art" than actual fossil, so maybe the cultural artifact label really applies? Anyway it's true that much more information is needed to understand what happened here. I suspect this might have more to do with EU politics than Moroccan law, but we will see. The fossils were seized years ago, perhaps due to paperwork issues as Kikokuryu suggests, and have been held in storage ever since. Maybe there was a couple of fossils of actual scientific importance in the lot, or maybe some archeological material that is covered by law, and it was easier to return the whole lot than to sort through it to pick out the important things and continue to warehouse a load of scientifically worthless fossils. Don Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johannes Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 On 16.10.2020 at 2:04 PM, FossilDAWG said: Anyway it's true that much more information is needed to understand what happened here. I suspect this might have more to do with EU politics than Moroccan law, but we will see. It has to do with UNESCO directives concerning national cultural properties, signed by most states of the world. Unfortunately, definitions if fossils belong to "national cultural property" are 1. very different from country to country and 2. protecting acts are now sometimes taken more serious in other countries than by the administrations of the countries of origin or are a kind of overbaording even for middle-of-the-road-fossils. As fa as I know also a topic in the US concerning brasilian cretaceous fossils... Very difficult and political sensitive story, esp. in Europe with its history of brutal colonialism in African, S-American and Asian regions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxytropidoceras Posted October 24, 2020 Share Posted October 24, 2020 One the articles linked to the Slate article posted by Tigy's Dad is interesting. It is: Morocco Opens Investigation into Auction of Dinosaur Tail Fossils in Mexico by Sana Elouazi, Morocco World news, January 19, 2018. Related articles are: Morocco probes dinosaur tail sold in Mexico auction AFP, Rabat Sunday 21 January 2018 Morocco probes dinosaur tail sold in Mexico auction, PhysOrg, January 21, 2018 The probe came up with some interesting findings of a "Tall Tail." Tall tail: Morocco casts doubt on Mexico 'dinosaur' fragment, PhysOrg, January 22, 2018 Yours, Paul H. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now