Robski Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 Found this in a river canyon in Northeastern B.C. that cuts through Cretaceaous sediments. It is out of a large broken ironstone nodule (120lbs) polished by the river gravels. Actually, the river gravels are dominated by ironstone weathering out of the soft sediments. Appears to be folded in on itself but the other side is hidden by the ironstone matrix. It looks to be a Palm frond of some type but I am not sure. What puzzles me is that it looks like a single crenulated leaf. There are a fair number of fossil plant bits around at this location and I did find another piece of one of these upriver. Any help would be appreciated. Best Regards Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClearLake Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 My first thought is a piece of an Inoceramus clam which were quite common in the Cretaceous. And yes, they could be very large. Here is an example right out of Wikipedia: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_gotta_rock Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 I'm a mollusk person myself. I'm not so good with paleobotany, but it does not look like a shellfish to me. Looks much more like veins coming from a central rib. If you've found other leaves in the area, you're probably right that this is a large leaf. Maybe @Fossildude19, @oilshale or @paleoflor have some ideas? I refuse to give up my childish wonder at the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norki Posted October 17, 2020 Share Posted October 17, 2020 2 hours ago, ClearLake said: My first thought is a piece of an Inoceramus clam which were quite common in the Cretaceous. Yeah, agreed, my first thought was also Inoceramus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robski Posted October 17, 2020 Author Share Posted October 17, 2020 I have found quite a few Inoceramus fossils in ironstone concretions in this area but nothing over 4-5 inches. This is only a fragment and is over two feet long. Regards Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norki Posted October 17, 2020 Share Posted October 17, 2020 27 minutes ago, Robski said: I have found quite a few Inoceramus fossils in ironstone concretions in this area but nothing over 4-5 inches. This is only a fragment and is over two feet long. Regards Rob A two foot long fragment is definitely within the realm of possibility. These things got up to be about four feet long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oilshale Posted October 17, 2020 Share Posted October 17, 2020 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inoceramus#/media/File:Inoceramus_steenstrup,_world's_largest_fossil_mollusk.jpg The largest known Inoceramus with 1.8m (6 foot !) was found in Greenland. 2 Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes (Confucius, 551 BC - 479 BC). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpc Posted October 17, 2020 Share Posted October 17, 2020 I have seen my share of both Cret clams and Cret palm fronds. This on is a clam internal mold. The ridges are rounded like a roller coaster. On a plam leaf they would be triangular. edit: I wrote this a few days ago and never hit send 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robski Posted October 17, 2020 Author Share Posted October 17, 2020 Fair Enough That is one BIG Clam. Thank You Everyone!! Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robski Posted October 17, 2020 Author Share Posted October 17, 2020 Here are a couple close ups. Not sure if is cast or if it is a fossil piece of the shell. Best Regards Rob H Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DPS Ammonite Posted October 17, 2020 Share Posted October 17, 2020 14 hours ago, Robski said: Here are a couple close ups. Not sure if is cast or if it is a fossil piece of the shell. Best Regards Rob Look for calcite prisms normal to clam surface that indicate that this is the original calcite shell. Better close up photos might reveal the prisms. Also, test shell with HCl acid to see if it fizzes. Calcite shell will fizz. 1 My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned. See my Arizona Paleontology Guide link The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robski Posted October 17, 2020 Author Share Posted October 17, 2020 Hello No there are no calcite prisms or remnant prism structures visible in the ironstone. Likely a cast. Although I also find big ammonites in these ironstone concretions and sometimes none of the original shell is present after they are replaced / mineralized. Sometimes there is some remnant calcareous shell but 90% of the time there is not. I don't know if that applies here. I agree it is probably a cast. Appreciate your Help. Thanks Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robski Posted October 18, 2020 Author Share Posted October 18, 2020 Under magnification I do see some small remnants of shell under the fossil. There is definitely a third dimension to it. Here are a couple river-worn Ammonites from upriver that are totally replaced by the ironstone within the concretions. The remaining ironstone matrix is firmly attached to the fossils. Best Regards Rob 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johannes Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 Inoceramus was my first thought, too, but second I would also mention tracefossils like Dictyodora, Zoophycos or Phycodes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now