Jump to content

P. contortus?


SharkySarah

Recommended Posts

Fairly confident this is a P. contortus but would love a second opinion. From the Calvert formation. 

654AE173-C55E-4333-8A03-A1AA6DCE0DFA.jpeg

0E8BBDF0-CB3D-4053-B7B9-154D54E5D7DC.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could be P. contortus but it also seems possible it is Galeocerdo aduncus. This is hard to tell because the differences in serrations is hard to see on a worn specimen like this. The serrations on G aduncus get more coarse as they move towards the notch and form a more distinct distal notch. Some believe that P. contortus and G. aduncus are synonymous anyway so I wouldn't agonize over it too much.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks more like a Carcharhinus sp. to me. It lacks a distal notch and the root is wrong for Physogaleus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 2nd is a Carcharhinus the first is indeed a physogaleus as evidenced by the subtle twist in the blade 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Searcher78 said:

The first tooth is a worn contortus.  The second tooth is a Carcharhinus.

Haha we posted that at exactly the same time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, will stevenson said:

Haha we posted that at exactly the same time

It is always nice to get confirmation!

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...