Jump to content

Heteromorphic Ammonite - Is it real?


Wei Yang Low

Recommended Posts

Dear all,

 

Recently I purchased a "Nostoceras Malagasyense" Heteromorphic Ammonite from an online platform. Initially, I didn't question the authenticity of the specimen, as the seller seems to have quite a few Cleoniceras ammonites for sale (which are clearly genuine). However for this piece I'm quite unsure if it is truly authentic, and would like a second opinion.

I understand that there is an Export Ban for fossils from China, but to my understanding that's for Vertebrate fossils (ammonites are invertebrates).

 

My main concerns are:

Is it a legitimate fossil?

Some parts look carved, but at the same time some of the striations look too difficult/ not worth the effort to forge for the price paid.

 

Thank you!

IMG_8019.thumb.jpg.fff17ad7cfbefeae19d5f7d77d1fd9ab.jpgIMG_8018.thumb.jpg.a8388b3b43c4731b26bfbd6da9b0095a.jpgIMG_8017.thumb.jpg.ad2716d59e2e145439d1f3e436237179.jpgIMG_8014.thumb.jpg.7afa9a4ec141c94d2d502941b5b821b2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

1- please post your photos directly on the forum instead of giving links that force us to leave the forum,


2- if you had read the document you accepted by registering here, you would know that no monetary estimate of the fossils is given.

Welcome to our great community.
 
Coco

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Coco said:

Hi,

 

1- please post your photos directly on the forum instead of giving links that force us to leave the forum,


2- if you had read the document you accepted by registering here, you would know that no monetary estimate of the fossils is given.

Welcome to our great community.
 
Coco

My apologies as I am a new user. Literally created my account minutes ago. Am currently figuring out how to display the images without uploading them as files. Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, now the pics work. I can’t really help you, but it seems sculpted to me. I call a specialist @Ludwigia , answers will come.

 

Coco

  • I found this Informative 1

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Ludwigia said:

To my eye, an awful lot of this fossil has been carved to improve its appearance. It could be however be, that the basis is an original steinkern.

Hi Ludwigia,

 

I understand, thank you for your reply!

May I clarify if the definition of steinkern, vs casts & molds?

Would the definition of an an original steinkern therefore mean that this is likely an authentic ammonite fossil (which has been manually carved)?

 

Also, would like to seek your input- Would carving of an ammonite steinkern devalue it or is it better in its raw, unaltered form?

Thanks again.

 

-WY Low

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should I cry or should I laugh? Please reclaim your money, @Wei Yang Low!

@Ludwigia is spot on.

@Ludwigia, do you know the original matrix of this species? This sculpture looks like limestone to me.

Ok, its from Madagascar, so it must be altered in some way to be exported. 

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, FranzBernhard said:

Should I cry or should I laugh? Please reclaim your money, @Wei Yang Low!

@Ludwigia is spot on.

@Ludwigia, do you know the original matrix of this species? This sculpture looks like limestone to me.

Ok, its from Madagascar, so it must be altered in some way to be exported. 

Franz Bernhard

Ok, thanks for your input! Appreciate the help.

May I ask, for this particular specimen below, is it any different from the one I posted above?

 

IMG_8030.thumb.jpg.768032aabfd4def99c0b82a48cb3345d.jpgIMG_8029.jpg.d94953c0715a963c8c6cd1e805039c20.jpgIMG_8028.thumb.jpg.e385e3a2ede7c45b990ea78f1052823a.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there was ever a real fossil in there, any sign of it has been obliterated by the sculptor, as far as I can see. So I would consider it a sculpture, possibly created from raw rock. I don't know if it is the same rock that N. malagasyense occurs in, but that's a moot point!

I hope you didn't pay too much for it.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops, you got another post in before I did - my reply was to the one at the top!

This one may have been an authentic fossil, but again, it's hard to tell, as the sculptor has altered it a great deal. I wonder if those apparent dendrites (the black marks) indicate an originally natural rock/fossil surface...  :zzzzscratchchin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wei Yang Low said:

Hi Ludwigia,

 

I understand, thank you for your reply!

May I clarify if the definition of steinkern, vs casts & molds?

Would the definition of an an original steinkern therefore mean that this is likely an authentic ammonite fossil (which has been manually carved)?

 

Also, would like to seek your input- Would carving of an ammonite steinkern devalue it or is it better in its raw, unaltered form?

Thanks again.

 

-WY Low

Steinkern = cast. It looks to me that this was a steinkern which was not very distinctive in its details and was then considerably enhanced by carving to resemble the original form. As to your last question indirectly, in this case if I had found this myself, I would probably have thrown it away.

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Wei Yang Low said:

Ok, thanks for your input! Appreciate the help.

May I ask, for this particular specimen below, is it any different from the one I posted above?

 

This one at least looks somewhat better and shows clearly that it's a steinkern. But it has also been carved quite a bit to enhance it.

  • I found this Informative 2

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be wrong but the overall shape of the first one looks suspicious to me compared to others I've seen. If there ever was any original fossil to that first one, it was only a small part, I suspect, and the sculptor used his imagination to complete it.

The 2nd one looks like a more authentic shape overall, but the sculptor's aggressive enhancing would turn me off. So I would not spend more than pocket change for the second one (if that), and zero for the first - speaking for myself only!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all! I've certainly learnt a great deal today. Appreciate you guys taking your time off to assist me. Cheers & have a great week ahead

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ditto to what Ludwigia has said.  and Wei Yang Low, this forum is a great place to learn.  I wish you the best of luck in all your next purchases. 

 

RB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...