Ash Tree Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 Hello TFF, I purchased this relatively inexpensive specimen at Mineralfest this past fall, and I was wondering if anyone could tell me more about it. The seller informed me it could possibly be from Madagascar, but was transparent in admitting that she couldn't confirm for sure. It was with other pieces of petrified wood that were brown, but I was drawn to this one due to the red hues. I think it's agatized, and it looks "glassy," although there are too many impurities to shine a cell phone light through it. One side is polished, and I put water on the rougher backside to show more of the details in the coloration. When I went to research the process of identifying tree species from petrified wood, I came across high powered microscopes that could identify structures on a cellular level. I don't have access to that sort of technology, but I was wondering if anyone has any guesses as to what the species could be, how old it might be, what it might be made of, or any other information that could be gathered from looking at the specimen. I'm always curious about what the prehistoric "story" could be behind a fossil, or anything related to the unique biology of ancient life. Thank you for your time, and your knowledge is greatly appreciated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Tree Posted December 15, 2020 Author Share Posted December 15, 2020 Additional research has led me to believe that this fossil may be made of jasper, or a combination of agate and jasper? https://www.fossilera.com/pages/agate-jasper-chalcedony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johannes Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 Can you post a better Picture (+resolution, +sharpness) of the area at 12o'clock (first picture)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahnmut Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 Hi Ash Tree, welcome to the forum. I have seen similar pieces of petrified wood from the trias of Madagascar sold as Araucarioxylon sp. Looking it up I just learned that this name is not up to date but often used for fossil conifer wood that has not been identified more exactly. I think there are similar woods from Arizona, but those are usually much more expensive than the ones from Madagascar, at least here in Europe. For a more exact ID of wood you often need microscopy. But there may be a connoisseur of fossil wood here on the forum who can tell you much more. Yes, there are often regions of jasper and agate in these fossil woods, both are modifications of quartz, sometimes you also get macrocrystalline quartz lining hollow spaces in the wood . Best Regards J 2 Try to learn something about everything and everything about something Thomas Henry Huxley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabRatKing Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 Mahmut has nailed it, and I can confirm that there is quite a bit of very similar petrified wood all over the American Southwest that looks just like this. I have quite a few specimens of it myself. I am unfamiliar with Madagascan petrified wood however. Your ID of jasper is likely correct, as this is a name for the rusty red-orange chalcedonies, a very common mineral in fossils as Mahnmut explained. The polished side is magnificent. I have never seen a cross section that included a branch knot so clearly. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Tree Posted December 16, 2020 Author Share Posted December 16, 2020 15 hours ago, Johannes said: the area at 12o'clock Here is a close-up picture of that area. Hopefully it will help with identification! 10 hours ago, Mahnmut said: conifer wood Thank you for this information! Is there something specific in the detail of the fossil visible to the naked eye that indicates that it is probably fossilized conifer wood, as opposed to fossilized deciduous wood? 7 hours ago, LabRatKing said: branch knot I appreciate your input! I am intrigued by it as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Tree Posted March 10, 2021 Author Share Posted March 10, 2021 (edited) Hello! I recently acquired a pocket microscope and was wondering if anyone had any advice on identifying plant fossils using the cellular structure, and I've attached images below. (Edit: I'm using a pocket microscope with 20x - 60x magnification) I'm pretty confident that this is a coniferous specimen since it shares a lot of similarities with this image: On 12/15/2020 at 9:18 AM, Mahnmut said: microscopy Edited March 10, 2021 by Ash Tree Clarification Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahnmut Posted March 10, 2021 Share Posted March 10, 2021 Was there even something like deciduous wood in the triassic? Of course we do not know the age for sure. Sorry, i know that a microscope is needed for wood ID, but I do not know how to do it. I would search for reference images online. or for an expert. Best Regards, J Try to learn something about everything and everything about something Thomas Henry Huxley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now