Jump to content

PrehistoricWonders

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I found this bone on the beach today and wanted your guys thoughts. I really didn’t think it was fossilized, but I did the burn test anyway to be sure, and there is no burning hair smell. What are your guys thoughts?
It was found in New Jersey, on a beach where I have found a couple shark teeth(4 or 5) including a Great White and a couple sand tigers. I think it’s a worn vertebrae, but I don’t know beyond that.

When I get home I can get measurements, but I’d guess ~1-1.5” by ~1”.

@Praefectus @Al Dente @MarcoSr @Darktooth @hokietech96 @Trevor @frankh8147

248F59F4-7F3D-4CD2-9AF1-3553AD39DC43.jpeg

880C63A6-A4DF-409F-9C78-C60ED2045AE6.jpeg

288C41A7-866A-42DE-9149-D376B518B9BC.jpeg

6D30A07B-9EFD-4701-8D4A-4BC5C66CD3ED.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like bone (you can make out the vascularized bone texture, and in certain places some remnants of cortical bone), and vertebra is probably a good guess based on the fossil's barrel-shape. The bone is very worn, though, so I doubt it'll be possible to get a proper ID for it, except that it won't be fish. Material found on this beach, would it be Cretaceous (to judge by the location of New Jersey)?

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering that too, but I don’t think so. I think more likely Miocene-Pleistocene, but I’m not positive. I’ve never found a Cretaceous fossil on this beach... but I don’t know it’s impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Familyroadtrip said:

I was wondering that too, but I don’t think so. I think more likely Miocene-Pleistocene, but I’m not positive. I’ve never found a Cretaceous fossil on this beach... but I don’t know it’s impossible.

Going by the type of preservation, I'd say that it matches my expectations for Pleistocene. It seems very similar to material of the same age from both Florida and the Netherlands...

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

Going by the type of preservation, I'd say that it matches my expectations for Pleistocene. It seems very similar to material of the same age from both Florida and the Netherlands...

Nice! That would be awesome! Do you have a guess at species?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe a worn dolphin vert if it was found in proximity to teeth from recent species of shark. Probably brought in from offshore deposits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pygal scute of marine turtle

The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. Terry Pratchett ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PaleoNoel said:

Maybe a worn dolphin vert if it was found in proximity to teeth from recent species of shark. Probably brought in from offshore deposits.

That'd be awesome! 

 

9 hours ago, Praefectus said:

I think it is fossil mammal bone. Not sure if it can be identified further. 

Yeah, it’s very worn, so I get that.

 

8 hours ago, jnoun11 said:

pygal scute of marine turtle

Got a pic? It could be, but in person it looks more like a vert than anything I’ve seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Familyroadtrip said:

Nice! That would be awesome! Do you have a guess at species?

Pleistocene is  outside of my area of expertise, so really wouldn't know. Also, with both sides of the vertebral centrum so worn down, I doubt this can be identified. For that I think you'd need to at least be able to say whether the vertebral surfaces were flat, convex or concave.  Depending on the combination and order (front to back), you'd at least be able ti speculate on whether it's mammal, reptile, etc. But I see some others have made some suggestions already ;)

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

Pleistocene is  outside of my area of expertise, so really wouldn't know. Also, with both sides of the vertebral centrum so worn down, I doubt this can be identified. For that I think you'd need to at least be able to say whether the vertebral surfaces were flat, convex or concave.  Depending on the combination and order (front to back), you'd at least be able ti speculate on whether it's mammal, reptile, etc. But I see some others have made some suggestions already ;)

It’s not concave, one side might be convex, but it’s so worn I’m not positive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...