Jump to content

Cretaceous shark tooth


Kev

Recommended Posts

My guess is a lateral Scapanorhynchus or a Cretolamna tooth but without the cusps and root I can't tell which.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think it's goblin (no striations and seems too thick). I think it could be Cretolamna or Cretoxyrhina but can't tell which without the whole tooth. Could also be other lamnids but can't really say without better locality.

"Argumentation cannot suffice for the discovery of new work, since the subtlety of Nature is greater many times than the subtlety of argument." - Carl Sagan

"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." - Richard Feynman

 

Collections: Hell Creek Microsite | Hell Creek/Lance | Dinosaurs | Sharks | SquamatesPost Oak Creek | North Sulphur RiverLee Creek | Aguja | Permian | Devonian | Triassic | Harding Sandstone

Instagram: @thephysicist_tff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ThePhysicist said:

Don't think it's goblin (no striations and seems too thick). I think it could be Cretolamna or Cretoxyrhina but can't tell which without the whole tooth. Could also be other lamnids but can't really say without better locality.

Scapanorhynchus laterals don't have striations except for the edges where the crown and root meet, that area missing/eroded in the specimen. It does seem a little thick. As you said it's just a guessing game without the rest of the tooth.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...