Jump to content

Virginia Miocene/Pliocene Shells


historianmichael

Recommended Posts

historianmichael

Last month I collected fossil shells at several exposures in Virginia of the Late Miocene Eastover Formation (Cobham Bay Member) and Early Pliocene Yorktown Formation (Sunken Meadow Member). While my intention was to focus on the larger fossils, when I got home and started to clean my finds, I thought it would be cool to screen the excess debris and see what else I had found. Although I ended up finding a lot of tiny shells and shell fragments, they require a microscope to see and the fine details have made identification challenging. I have consulted several publications on these formations and yet I am a bit stumped on these last ten fossils. Any help further narrowing these down would be greatly appreciated! 

 

Eastover Formation

#1

bivalve.thumb.jpg.f4cabfef06c4b91e1c42a4e15fba6480.jpg 1679631484_1(3).thumb.jpg.2abe6fc132208dd0ee4b01d447d751e0.jpg

 

#2- Gari sp.?

739809923_bivalve4.thumb.jpg.0aa370a43e94fef88fb83af51fb00606.jpg 643214456_bivalve1.thumb.jpg.8dab86834b64bd7cbbe183bbec144a52.jpg 

2016479504_bivalve3(1).thumb.jpg.b650f7ca5342eb3107b8c0de8dc23bd5.jpg 1106883546_bivalve3.thumb.jpg.3ea4a03765515f4f234be70fef57fe4f.jpg

 

#3- Nucula sp.?

659654749_bivalve7.thumb.jpg.f510289e17d42ee0b6b1eaf5e49ad892.jpg 384098956_1(2).thumb.jpg.089669a066aff8dbd8afc3a3be5893e3.jpg 

 

Yorktown Formation 
#4

1630263868_snail3-1.thumb.jpg.719e43f84d5f06456220282ce7c599c0.jpg q.thumb.jpg.6122ed13312c7b4a87348eca3a0dd849.jpg

 

#5

1897731071_bivalve2-3.thumb.jpg.511625fcf40109392ce504d369f61f4a.jpg 1.thumb.jpg.06f6899c3ee209d097842a1528634099.jpg

 

#6- Chama congregata?

1922911652_bivalve2-5.thumb.jpg.3082be3cbfb02170a4286557d853f9ec.jpg 1801675504_bivalve2-6.thumb.jpg.0d2d8a2af2b4ae726e9aed5999344ebb.jpg

 

#7- Chama congregata?

455680224_bivalve2-7.thumb.jpg.b9791c8ea18e331a606abb3eb5996391.jpg 866599221_bivalve2-4.thumb.jpg.f705d51b792e97aaf20aa2fce2f5a00a.jpg

1852018250_bivalve2-9.thumb.jpg.edae2b24f71558fa6cf317633e04f552.jpg 1750476358_bivalve2-8.thumb.jpg.f701170046184604312468bd152d3444.jpg

 

#8

1982492680_snail4-1.thumb.jpg.c1db8108d2ccdbc897c8071ca31b6d8b.jpg 1.thumb.jpg.d31e5fe2a941457317f2aa19c203ee27.jpg

 

#9

1229836176_snail2-1.thumb.jpg.2f8a7fb43da6542d14616c8de6f31b1c.jpg

 

#10

IMG_4027.thumb.jpg.9712fd7cdbe086fc984a0d4258f4bcb8.jpg IMG_4028.thumb.jpg.2821dc892e13e076ea82498e15796058.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll give the Yorktown ones a shot until one of the experts like @MikeR @sixgill pete or @Al Dente chime in with the correct answers.  My names all come from Campbells 1993 Virginia Publication 127.

4.  That's a nice little shell.  Check out Boreotrophon tetricus as it seems to fit as best I can tell from your picture 

5.  Looks like one of the pectens, but not sure how far you'll get with an ID since its looks quite eroded

6.  Chama (and probably C. congregata due to the clockwise coiling)

7.  Chama (and probably C. congregata due to the clockwise coiling)

8.  This one is tough as it looks very juvenile and is a little beat up and I can't clearly see the aperture, but it is one of the Muricidaes, maybe look at Coralliophila leonensis (I guess that one is not technically in Muricidae, but it is similar)

9.  Seems like this might be a protoconch of a Busycon.  There are a couple of species from the Yorktown but none that I found show a good picture of this small of a specimen.  

10.  Not real sure, but perhaps one of the Eucrassatella species, especially if it feels heavy/thick for its size.

 

Hope this helps at least a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
historianmichael

Thank you both for your initial thoughts!

 

@ClearLake I had too thought that #4 looks like Boreotrophon tetricus, but I was a little thrown off by the lack of a long siphonal canal. I had found another Boreotrophon tetricus and #4 looks a little different. Here is a photo of that shell:

 

boreo.thumb.jpg.76a9953d3fa283a8c3da23ae91618ebb.jpg

 

 

I am not sure that #5 is a pecten. This shell is more arced and resembles more of a clam than a scallop. It looked a little like an ark clam but I wasn't too confident in that.

 

@hemipristis Lirophora is a possibility, but I wasn't too sure since the ribs on this shell are not as prominent as one typically sees on Lirophora

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, historianmichael said:

lack of a long siphonal canal

My assumption is that it is just broken off.  You have the specimen in hand, maybe you can tell if that is true or not.  Is the one you posted for ID a lot smaller than this other one you found?  If so, compare them side by side and see if the small one looks similar to the earliest whorls on the bigger one.  There are some species that look quite different in their youngest stages.

 

21 hours ago, historianmichael said:

It looked a little like an ark clam

An ark clam should have the taxodont dentition (many small teeth) and I do not see that on your shell.  It looks to me like the remains of broken auricles at the hinge area, but maybe I'm misinterpreting what I see.  Also remember, that in pectens, one valve is often much more inflated that the other.  Just what I was thinking.

 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
sixgill pete

I will try to take some time shortly to review these. I use the same reference as @ClearLake along with the NCFC mollusk publication and the Lee Creek paper from the Smithsonian contributions to paleobiology.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.  At first I thought Parvilucina but the hinge is wrong.  Maybe Astarte.

2.  Tellinidae

3.  Nucula

4.  Boreotrophon tetricus

5.  Clinocardium probably C. acutilaqueatum

6. & 7.  Chama congregata

8. & 9.  Immature Neogastropoda in either family Buccinidae or Fasciolariidae.

10.  Immature Eucrasatella virginica

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...