Jump to content

March 2021 - Finds of the Month Entries


digit

Recommended Posts

Invertebrate

 

Discovered March 28, 2021

 

Romaniceras mexicanum

Upper Cretaceous (Turonian)

Blue Hill Mbr. of the Carlile Shale

Sandoval Co.  NM

 

20210330_122624.thumb.jpg.f9a44ef711f9e04d065f2ba3b1034129.jpg

 

20210330_122910.thumb.jpg.794b51e0cc3894803039b2d53b05500a.jpg

 

IMG_20210330_122434_781.thumb.jpg.672d224d2dde5809a3c43baf722c5d87.jpg

  • I found this Informative 3
  • Enjoyed 9

"I am glad I shall never be young without wild country to be young in. Of what avail are forty freedoms without a blank spot on the map?"  ~Aldo Leopold (1887-1948) 

 

New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletins    

 

point.thumb.jpg.e8c20b9cd1882c9813380ade830e1f32.jpg research.jpg.932a4c776c9696d3cf6133084c2d9a84.jpg  RPV.jpg.d17a6f3deca931bfdce34e2a5f29511d.jpg  SJB.jpg.f032e0b315b0e335acf103408a762803.jpg  butterfly.jpg.71c7cc456dfbbae76f15995f00b221ff.jpg  Htoad.jpg.3d40423ae4f226cfcc7e0aba3b331565.jpg  library.jpg.56c23fbd183a19af79384c4b8c431757.jpg  OIP.jpg.163d5efffd320f70f956e9a53f9cd7db.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question, if we only find out something is worth entering after the month we found it, does it still count?

as in we thought it was something common but ended up being something worth putting up :) 

Edited by will stevenson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, will stevenson said:

I have a question, if we only find out something is worth entering after the month we found it, does it still count?

 

A new identification of a Fossil found in a previous month does not make it eligible for entry in the current month's contest.  It could have been entered in the month it was found with a generally accepted common name.  ;)

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JohnJ said:

 

A new identification of a Fossil found in a previous month does not make it eligible for entry in the current month's contest.  It could have been entered in the month it was found with a generally accepted common name.  ;)

Thanks for your answer John, i should have worded my question better

if one month we find what we thought was something fairly ordinary, and didn't enter it, and the next month we found out it was actually worth entering, is it allowable to enter it. (also just to clarify, this doesn't apply to me i was just wondering if identification would be treated similarly to preparation) :) thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, will stevenson said:

Thanks for your answer John, i should have worded my question better

if one month we find what we thought was something fairly ordinary, and didn't enter it, and the next month we found out it was actually worth entering, is it allowable to enter it. (also just to clarify, this doesn't apply to me i was just wondering if identification would be treated similarly to preparation) :) thanks again

 

The short answer is, "no".

 

Again, learning a more precise identification doesn't make it now eligible.

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JohnJ said:

 

The short answer is, "no".

 

Again, learning a more precise identification doesn't make it now eligible.

ok :) thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went collecting at the end of February the year before last and found some amazing things that i would have loved to enter into Fossil Of The Month. 

By the time I got home it was March. :shakehead::shrug:

  • Enjoyed 1

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tidgy's Dad said:

I went collecting at the end of February the year before last and found some amazing things that i would have loved to enter into Fossil Of The Month. 

By the time I got home it was March. :shakehead::shrug:

 

The inconveniences of poor cell phone coverage and local internet access will sometimes cross paths with bad timing.  Fortunately, it is rare.

  • I Agree 1

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My first Meg I’ve found! I was elated to pull this guy out of the sifter! Nothing like the feeling(except if I found a big Meg lol).  Oh and it measures .72”! 

 

 

Date of Discovery :03/15/2021

Scientific and/or Common Name:Megalodon

Geologic Age or Geologic Formation:Miocene 

State, Province, or Region Found: Arcadia, Florida, USA 

 

2668E5F0-70C9-48F6-8E54-83457F4E461F.jpeg

A7EEEA6E-62A7-48C1-B317-F1BD92DF5D31.jpeg

3CCCB087-BD2B-465C-9681-A571FF2D635C.jpeg

CDA7197A-5D8C-4FC5-9C2C-ED59F7EEB0E6.jpeg

Edited by MeisTravis
  • I found this Informative 2
  • Enjoyed 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sooooo excited!! Thanks to the help of many forum friends, I respectfully submit this coprolite filled with conodont segments! It is my understanding that the brown matrix is the phosphate stool, and like modern day stools, "teeth" aren't digested well.....To think that 300mya some fish/predator caught, killed, ate, digested, then excreted what it couldn't digest!!- Boyhood imagination perpetuated!!!......Soooooo cool!!!!, really, SOOOOOOOO Cool!!!!  :) thanks for looking!   Bone

 

 

Date of Discovery- 3/29/2021

Common/Scientific Name Coprolite comprised of conodont elements

Geologic age or Geologic Formation-Stark Shale Member (between Winterset and Bethany falls limestone)-Pennsylvanian

State, Province or Region Found- Kansas City, Missouri USA

 

675479415_Conodontcoprolite.jpg.4036775d3f9009edaed342fb757c1132.jpg

 

 

 

  • I found this Informative 2
  • Enjoyed 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys, if anyone has a better ID for this, I’d love to know :) 

At bracklesham bay, bones of anything other than fish are very rare, I’ve talked to some people who’ve collected there may times a year for decades and only found a few. 
this is most likely from a crocodile or turtle.

 

 

Date of Discovery- 30/3/2021

Common/Scientific Name phalange of turtle/crocodile

Geologic age or Geologic Formation-Lutetian - Earnley Formation

State, Province or Region Found- Bracklesham Bay, Sussex, UK

 

3F11AE59-7D78-4723-905F-27EDFD8DE4D2.jpeg  22280508-FD0F-4F7F-BE37-EE6431DCCAE1.jpeg

179FD3E0-79E0-478E-8BE3-F2D01CF7ACFA.jpeg

  • I found this Informative 2
  • Enjoyed 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found another sweet little find looking through matrix I brought home, these are fairly rare to my knowledge :) @fossilsonwheels you might like to see this ;) 

 

 

Date of Discovery- 3/30/2021

Common/Scientific Name Rhizoprionodon ganntourensis (used to be scoliodon)

Geologic age or Geologic Formation-Lutetian - Earnley Formation

State, Province or Region Found- Bracklesham Bay, Sussex, UK

 

1F653F6E-B99D-4449-B3D8-BE1C5F66AA5B.jpeg  B49A3FE8-D92E-499A-A408-CCFDB91506C8.jpeg

  • I found this Informative 3
  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went back and forth about submitting this because of the interval between discovery and prep completion (the preparator wasn’t able to get to it until recently and I didn’t want this job rushed). I humbly withdraw if deemed ineligible. 

Date of Discovery- 7/7/20 (prep completed 3/29/21)

Common/Scientific Name Pachycephalosaurus wyomingensis

Geologic age or Geologic Formation Lance

State, Province or Region Found Weston Co, WY

3AA304D0-D79D-4117-B31D-30F6B4BAA4C8.thumb.jpeg.04ba2946cec3fb53184c3c1b13487b2a.jpegF4300A0F-18CD-4EBF-B6DD-C3421832AF70.thumb.jpeg.d57d774f51e529249cf570fb388c2d57.jpegA275551A-6784-4670-A513-DDCB76C2487E.thumb.jpeg.0eed10a066950a764c0cc6a704ba8521.jpeg0756F5F2-087B-491E-84DE-37466B0D12E8.thumb.jpeg.cbca3516d9eb976ad577d4d155067168.jpeg

  • I found this Informative 4
  • Enjoyed 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks @GeschWhat and @digit for the consult on this piece!

 

Found: 3/21/21
Name: Bitten coprolite, aka Dentalite

Description: Shows multiple bites from multiple critters of different size. Also shows bite activity on both top and bottom. Several of the bites seem to be from vertebrates
Formation: Bed 3, Calvert Formation
Age: Miocene 
Location: Central Virginia  Length: ~1 3/8"

276926793_Bittencoprolitecomposite.png.7917614cfe3e5bc350bfdd5755fd2ce2.png

  • I found this Informative 4
  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CUTEST FOSSIL OF THE MONTH!!!!

 

 Nothing like a last minute entry. It was not my intent, but my wife "forced" me to enter this. Of all of my collected fossils, she says this is her favorite. Obviously she likes petite things and felt this was cute enough to receive a vote or two. So here I am!! I believe this is         

 Not cleaned up completely due to time constraints.

   

Coincidentally, @connorp won the FOTM just 30 days ago with a similar trilobite, Anataphrus vigilans. Can the same species of trilobite win 2 months in a row?? We will see, but I hope not.... the conodont coprolite is deserving!!!!   Don't tell my wife I said this. @Malcolmt prepped the winning trilobite (great job) and added a comment that he was still looking for one of these bugs. So I mailed him a grade B specimen that I had up at the house. My purpose for going to this site was to hopefully find him a better bug than was presented and after spending 5 hours scouring the site, I returned home, dejected, having failed to find an Anataphrus. At least until I took my morning coffee down to my "fossil room" to look over my finds. Sipping my morning brew, I separated the fossils into trilobit piles, cephalopod piles, brachiopod piles ............Then grabbed the brachiopods to clean up a little and decide which to keep. Lo and behold, this LITTLE guy was hiding in a piece of matrix amongst the brachiopods! My wife is correct, it is SO CUTE!!!!!! And no, Malcolmt, my wife won't let me send it to you!!! I will just have to go fossiling again soon to see if another one is there!

  

 

 

Collected on 3/30/2021

Anataphrus vigilans trilobite

Lower Maquoketa Formation, Ordovician. 

From NE Iowa. 

  

DSC_0389.thumb.JPG.24848ce96ba59ea4923277b240da31df.JPG

  

Look close. The trilobite is sitting on top of a piece of Isotelus that I also found that day. What a variation of trilobite size. Here it is on a ruler. 

 

 DSC_0382.thumb.JPG.7f50f9fa676478d002269ca64de814f0.JPG 

And a few close ups.

 

 My fingerprints are about as large as the trilobite grooves.

 

DSC_0386.thumb.JPG.a1bbf2dca34169e1cacbc87ecf461a79.JPG 

 

 DSC_0388.thumb.JPG.85be2632e23e46baefe9d67ae0f05000.JPG

 

 DSC_0387.thumb.JPG.4fba3fcdad7a6260339fa9cea7de5eb7.JPG

  • I found this Informative 4
  • Enjoyed 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DSMJake said:

 

I went back and forth about submitting this because of the interval between discovery and prep completion (the preparator wasn’t able to get to it until recently and I didn’t want this job rushed). I humbly withdraw if deemed ineligible. 
Date of Discovery- 7/7/20 (prep completed 3/29/21)

Common/Scientific Name pachycephalosaurus wyomingensis

Geologic age or Geologic Formation Lance

State, Province or Region Found Weston Co, WY

 

I remember when you found this, I was so jealous!

Looks like it came out great!

  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, minnbuckeye said:

CUTEST FOSSIL OF THE MONTH!!!!

 

 Nothing like a last minute entry. It was not my intent, but my wife "forced" me to enter this. Of all of my collected fossils, she says this is her favorite. Obviously she likes petite things and felt this was cute enough to receive a vote or two. So here I am!! I believe this is Anataphrus vigilans trilobite from the lower Maquoketa Formation, which is Ordovician. It was collected on 3/30/2021 in NE Iowa.  Not cleaned up completely due to time constraints.

   

Coincidentally, @connorp won the FOTM just 30 days ago with a similar trilobite, Anataphrus vigilans. Can the same species of trilobite win 2 months in a row?? We will see, but I hope not.... the conodont coprolite is deserving!!!!   Don't tell my wife I said this. @Malcolmt prepped the winning trilobite (great job) and added a comment that he was still looking for one of these bugs. So I mailed him a grade B specimen that I had up at the house. My purpose for going to this site was to hopefully find him a better bug than was presented and after spending 5 hours scouring the site, I returned home, dejected, having failed to find an Anataphrus. At least until I took my morning coffee down to my "fossil room" to look over my finds. Sipping my morning brew, I separated the fossils into trilobit piles, cephalopod piles, brachiopod piles ............Then grabbed the brachiopods to clean up a little and decide which to keep. Lo and behold, this LITTLE guy was hiding in a piece of matrix amongst the brachiopods! My wife is correct, it is SO CUTE!!!!!! And no, Malcolmt, my wife won't let me send it to you!!! I will just have to go fossiling again soon to see if another one is there!

  

 

 

 

Mike. 

Please use the Format listed in the rules. 

Thanks.  :) 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit of a late entry here, hope I don't get told off! Better late than never, hey?

This is a large clump of coalified driftwood I found the other day. It is the largest I have ever found, and you can see some quite extraordinary preservation levels within some of the chunks, even preserving grain, and, in some cases, cell structure! Amongst the wood, there are hundreds of tiny shells, large shells, broken shells, whole shells, etc etc! There were also a couple beautiful whole gastropods, which, I had to get out! Also, lots of crinoids, which is really fascinating, bearing in mind that crinoids have been found hanging from the bottom of floating wood! Enough gibber gabber, here we go:

 

 

• Date of Discovery (month, day, year) = 03/31/2021 (dd/mm/yyyy is better!)

• Scientific and/or Common Name = coalified (drift)wood

• Geologic Age or Geologic Formation = Callovian - Oxfordian (166.1 - 157.3 mya)

• State, Province, or Region Found = The Cotswolds, England, UK

 

P1320025.thumb.JPG.27e2990c684f9b08d152586a7f99f2bd.JPG

P1320032.thumb.JPG.98c8b5ba53d6ff7630430ea837896eaa.JPGP1320034.thumb.JPG.6af9d6251fd299fc5b34fd7301b058a9.JPGP1320039.thumb.JPG.2102240efa8a1af060b36bf30ecb4f21.JPGP1320042.thumb.JPG.52b3bd706c620bc0c623c2ae78c388fa.JPGP1320044.thumb.JPG.5b14535dc0ef82d2c9d9750abb1605f1.JPG

And now for the fossils within!P1320048.thumb.JPG.57ee783a1a711a1ed23b3cc79ec44dc6.JPG
P1320053.thumb.JPG.63323d4202c9cc3f99432280d9de94d0.JPG
P1320055.thumb.JPG.83bc6814c36f775edb18fa431a365df4.JPG
P1320057.thumb.JPG.d0141c11f7447bfb77595a860091e9b2.JPG
P1320059.thumb.JPG.d9eb7397699248488589ca26a02757a0.JPG

 

And some sea snails in it, to finish off! Hope you all enjoy my entry of the coalified driftwood!

I personally think it's awesome, as it's a preserved micro-ecosystem of crinoids, wood, sea snails, gastropods... Enjoy!

  • I found this Informative 2
  • Enjoyed 3

~ Isaac; www.isaactfm.com 

 

"Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" - Alan Grant

 

Come to the spring that is The Fossil Forum, where the stream of warmth and knowledge never runs dry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although my submission is a lowly gastropod, it has some interesting pathology.

 

  • Discovered March 7, 2021
  • Pathological Strombus floridanus
  • Upper Pliocene Pinecrest Sand Member of the Tamiami Formation
  • Sarasota County, Florida USA

 

Damage to its mantle by a predator did not kill it, but definitely affected its morphology.  Pictures of the shell and comparison to a normal individual from the same locality.

 

IMG_2239.thumb.JPG.a59e506c2d0f5c6ca9a9db65e87f96ee.JPGIMG_2240.thumb.JPG.6e9acd0415b1fb3f09ceb22f8e77aa2b.JPG

 

 

1854071055_PathologicalS.floridanus.jpg

Edited by Fossildude19
  • I found this Informative 3
  • Enjoyed 3

"A problem solved is a problem caused"--Karl Pilkington

"I was dead for millions of years before I was born and it never inconvenienced me a bit." -- Mark Twain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MikeR said:

Although my submission is a lowly gastropod, it has some interesting pathology.

 

  • Discovered March 7, 2021
  • Pathological Strombus floridanus
  • Upper Pliocene Pinecrest Sand Member of the Tamiami Formation
  • Sarasota County, Florida USA

 

Damage to its mantle by a predator did not kill it, but definitely affected its morphology.  Pictures of the shell and comparison to a normal individual from the same locality.

 

IMG_2239.thumb.JPG.a59e506c2d0f5c6ca9a9db65e87f96ee.JPGIMG_2240.thumb.JPG.6e9acd0415b1fb3f09ceb22f8e77aa2b.JPG

1854071055_PathologicalS.floridanus.thumb.jpg.ef5e4a8f03d38ca2d7a20354b76b5fd2.jpg

 

that was not a happy snail:P

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • digit unfeatured this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...