digit Posted January 14, 2023 Share Posted January 14, 2023 1 hour ago, Doctor Mud said: Here’s one - the only one I’ve found at this site. Miocene. New Zealand. That's an odd one. Can we see if from multiple angles? It doesn't have the central ridge nor the perpendicular ridges running from the central ridge to the edges of the tooth. Based on my limited knowledge of this genus I'd not have known this was a Heterodontus tooth at all as it more resembled a myliobatid from what I see in the image. Other views would probably make it more clear. Cheers. -Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Mud Posted January 14, 2023 Share Posted January 14, 2023 7 hours ago, digit said: That's an odd one. Can we see if from multiple angles? It doesn't have the central ridge nor the perpendicular ridges running from the central ridge to the edges of the tooth. Based on my limited knowledge of this genus I'd not have known this was a Heterodontus tooth at all as it more resembled a myliobatid from what I see in the image. Other views would probably make it more clear. Cheers. -Ken My collection is packed away, but in the meantime - check out another photo of a port Jackson shark jaw for comparison. They don’t have the features you mentioned. Weird teeth, just like the owner 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digit Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 Some of the posterior crushing teeth do seem to show a faint ridge running across the teeth but they do lack the perpendicular ridges seem n much of the genus. They are such weird sharks. Cheers. -Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Mud Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 4 minutes ago, digit said: Some of the posterior crushing teeth do seem to show a faint ridge running across the teeth but they do lack the perpendicular ridges seem n much of the genus. They are such weird sharks. Cheers. -Ken You are right! the posterior teeth have a ridge now I look closely - but more to the edge. I wonder if they loose this feature quickly once they move forward. Crushing shells and crabs had got to wear those teeth out quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digit Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 23 minutes ago, Doctor Mud said: I wonder if they loose this feature quickly once they move forward. Crushing shells and crabs had got to wear those teeth out quickly. Much crunchier than oatmeal. Cheers. -Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fossilsonwheels Posted January 23, 2023 Author Share Posted January 23, 2023 (edited) I put this one in an ID thread and looked at quite a few anteriors before deciding to go with Heterodontus as the ID. Pretty happy to have a Heterodontus from a California location other than STH. Heterodontus sp Miocene Santa Margarita Formation Templeton, California Edited January 23, 2023 by fossilsonwheels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digit Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 Anterior gripping teeth seem to be either less common (or less commonly identified) than the larger posterior crushing teeth. Always nice to have a less common position from a new locality. Cheers. -Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now