Jump to content

I think I found a fossilized bone


Daniel Fischer

Recommended Posts

Hello, yesterday I was on a trip and found a rock that I think is a fossilized bone. I know this rock doesn't look like much but please don't judge it too fast because if you look closely it kind of has the shape of a bone, I don't know if I managed to capture the shape of it in the pictures and to me it reminds the shape of a Homo sapiens shoulder.

please tell me your thoughts and ideas :brokebone: 

bone1.jpeg

bone2.jpeg

bone3.jpeg

bone4.jpeg

bone5.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. I wouldn't dismiss it lightly, but I'm afraid in the end I don't see bone here.

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not seeing a bone here, unfortunately. :unsure: 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Tim and Dale.

More than just shape, be on the look out for texture. Some fossil bones show a kind of spongy, porous texture (cancellous tissue) in cross section. Surface areas will also be distinct with a kind of smooth, occasionally "glossy" surface. 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 1

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Kane said:

I agree with Tim and Dale.

More than just shape, be on the look out for texture. Some fossil bones show a kind of spongy, porous texture (cancellous tissue) in cross section. Surface areas will also be distinct with a kind of smooth, occasionally "glossy" surface. 

I know that bones have this porous texture as you said, so if this rock is anyway probably not a bone do you think it's a good idea to cut it and see inside?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since it doesn't appear to be bone, I don't see the harm in cutting it and having a look-see.

  • Thank You 1
  • I Agree 1

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Kane said:

I don't see the harm in cutting it and having a look-see.

:chuckle: I fairly flipped there until I realized Lori's example wasn't the post after a hammer blow.

  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Today I took a piece of my maybe fossilized bone and looked at it under my microscope. I am not a professional and neither my microscope... but I was able to see the texture of the rock and compare it to photos of fossilized bones on the internet. I found the texture to be petty similar and on top of that I may be able to cut it open soon. 

so with the growing possibility to tell for sure if this fossil is a bone or not I wanted to ask you if this rock is a bone what kind of bone do you think it is? And I would love to hear anything you have to say about this.:brokebone:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may take a bit of finessing but I have been able to take some great photos through a microscope lens using my smartphone.  You can try doing that and posting a photo. However, the shape does not resemble any bone I have seen. Here is a recent post that shows how chert nodules can appear in their natural habitat (so to speak). 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...