Jump to content

Dromaeosaur or Nanotyranus tooth?


AJ Plai

Recommended Posts

Hi I have had this Hell Creek tooth that was previously ID as Dromaeosaur (possibly Dakota Raptor) for a while and the other day I decided to get my magnifying camera out to take a deeper look at the specimen as I have heard that some Dromaeosaur and small Nanotyranus teeth can be quite challenging to tell apart from one another. These are the close up pics of the specimen that I am still a little unsure about: 

 

 

Mesial side with serration showing a little carinae twist 

1720996698_HCNano-DromaeosaurA05(mesial).thumb.jpg.97b3c874cfe07d45fdd82a3579a9e23e.jpg

 

 

Distal side with straight carinae that stretches down to the base of the tooth in straight line:

202453057_HCNano-DromaeosaurA05(distal).thumb.jpg.3b8fb626d34e0c0cacf8e283529094e5.jpg

 

Cross-section looks a little rectangular with what seem like a small pinch on the sides?

1583644748_HCNano-DromaeosaurA06(Cross-Section).thumb.jpg.c0192bd0f579eefbb6ebc30ee8350aa1.jpg

 

 

From the initial observation under the scope it does seem like this could be a Nanotyranus tooth instead of a Dromaeosaur but I would like to hear the experts thought and input on it just to be sure. Thanks in advance!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgot to add the picture of the specimen not so up-close so you could see the shape of the tooth:

 

682683603_Dromaeosaur(HellCreek).thumb.jpg.30e9c52a40743e1efbdd75d7b863cf72.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any chance you could do a serration count (over 5mm) at the centre of the tooth on both sides?  Given the twist on the mesial carina I'd say it's a Tyrannosaur tooth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should know that Nanotyranus is actually a young Tyrannosaurus. due to an interesting study by jack Horner.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Daniel Fischer said:

You should know that Nanotyranus is actually a young Tyrannosaurus. due to an interesting study by jack Horner.

 

This is still up for debate and it has not been agreed upon. this is @Troodon's thread and it discusses the opposite, why Nanotyrannus is a valid species. It is very informative and I would recommend reading it

 

  • I found this Informative 2

“If fossils are not "boggling" your mind then you are simply not doing it right” -Ken (digit)

"No fossil is garbage, it´s just not completely preserved” -Franz (FranzBernhard)

"With hammer in hand, the open horizon of time, and dear friends by my side, what can we not accomplish together?" -Kane (Kane)

"We are in a way conquering time, reuniting members of a long lost family" -Quincy (Opabinia Blues)

"I loved reading the trip reports, I loved the sharing, I loved the educational aspect, I loved the humor. It felt like home. It still does" -Mike (Pagurus)

“The best deal I ever got was getting accepted as a member on The Fossil Forum. Not only got an invaluable pool of knowledge, but gained a loving family as well.” -Doren (caldigger)

"it really is nice, to visit the oasis that is TFF" -Tim (fossildude19)

"Life's Good! -Adam (Tidgy's Dad)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DinoFossilsUK said:

Any chance you could do a serration count (over 5mm) at the centre of the tooth on both sides?  Given the twist on the mesial carina I'd say it's a Tyrannosaur tooth.

 

Hi I counted the serrations under microscope and it looks like the mesial serration count is about 21 per 5 mm. whereas the distal serration count is about 16 per 5 mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say this is a Tyrannosaur tooth based on the size and shape of the serrations. If you favor Nanotyrannus being valid, I would say the CHR (Crown Height Ratio) leans it towards being a Nanotyrannus. A "twist" in the mesial carina is also more common in Nanotyrannus I believe (than T. rex).

 

I would still wait for more experienced eyes to weigh in, as dinosaurs aren't one of my specialties (yet). 

Edited by ThePhysicist
  • I found this Informative 2

"Argumentation cannot suffice for the discovery of new work, since the subtlety of Nature is greater many times than the subtlety of argument." - Carl Sagan

"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." - Richard Feynman

 

Collections: Hell Creek Microsite | Hell Creek/Lance | Dinosaurs | Sharks | SquamatesPost Oak Creek | North Sulphur RiverLee Creek | Aguja | Permian | Devonian | Triassic | Harding Sandstone

Instagram: @thephysicist_tff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a locality where this tooth was found to verify its Hell Creek?

 

The two Dromaeosaurids in the Hell Creek do not get that large.  The largest DR tooth in the holotype was 23mm.   Their mesial carina also do not have a twist and are much more compressed.  The base profile matches that of a Tyrannosaurid not these Dromaeosaurids.  I agree with the others Nanotyrannus .

 

FYI : Dakotaraptor is one word

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 1
  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/17/2021 at 6:50 PM, Troodon said:

Do you have a locality where this tooth was found to verify its Hell Creek?

 

The two Dromaeosaurids in the Hell Creek do not get that large.  The largest DR tooth in the holotype was 23mm.   Their mesial carina also do not have a twist and are much more compressed.  The base profile matches that of a Tyrannosaurid not these Dromaeosaurids.  I agree with the others Nanotyrannus .

 

FYI : Dakotaraptor is one word

 

Hi Troodon, thank you for your input and the correction; I got this several years back from a lot of assorted fossils that I purchased from CK Preparation, if I remember correctly there were assortment of fossils that were all marked as HC specimens, although if there may be possibility of error of locality or not I couldn't confirm or be sure a 100% to be honest....

 

Do you suspect that it may be from another locality?

Edited by AJ Plai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Troodon said:

I know CK and they collect in Garfield Co.  Montana with is HC

I also know them, and yes they are strictly Hell Creek collectors.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...