Jump to content

Leaf fossils in Broome sandstone (early cretaecous) Western Australia


G Mac

Recommended Posts

  • Fossildude19 changed the title to Leaf fossils in Broome sandstone (early cretaecous) Western Australia

Have you checked out these PDFS?

 

LINK 1


LINK 2

  • I found this Informative 5

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Fossildude19 said:

Have you checked out these PDFS?

 

LINK 1


LINK 2

That last picture I think isn't leaf fossil at all. Its one of the basic rules of plants - don't have veins cross each other as they are basically one way from roots to leaf. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tetradium said:

That last picture I think isn't leaf fossil at all. Its one of the basic rules of plants - don't have veins cross each other as they are basically one way from roots to leaf. 

 

Just wondering why you quoted me?  :headscratch:

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

 

Just wondering why you quoted me?  :headscratch:

You didn't said anything about one picture not being leaf. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is because I think it is some type of plant matter. 

Agree to disagree.  ;) 

  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tetradium said:

That last picture I think isn't leaf fossil at all. Its one of the basic rules of plants - don't have veins cross each other as they are basically one way from roots to leaf. 

IMG_E1137.thumb.JPG.0f9294c644a295bf1a678a6d7e8bb532.JPG

 

I agree with Tim that looks like a plant leaf form but which Genus/species I dont know...Could be something else but for comparison here is a closeup of a present day Ficus lyrata leaf and its similar venation/cell structure. 

1875919041_CloseupofFicuslyrataleaf.thumb.JPG.a37ef25d26ab6435a33ab8a61e59fca1.JPG

Regards, Chris 

 

19 hours ago, G Mac said:

I was wondering what these leaves are?

 

 IMG_E1145.thumb.JPG.63faa6e448dcfb14ff3f9e66387e8f60.JPGIMG_E1142.thumb.JPG.1e6503e73cd9429195c554c2090264b6.JPGIMG_E1141.thumb.JPG.a0b0fca0305277b3d67e28fdde5a0abf.JPGIMG_E1137.thumb.JPG.0f9294c644a295bf1a678a6d7e8bb532.JPG

Very neat finds! Not sure if there is enough fine detail/venation/attachment detail preserved to determine what the first 2 are.  I'm hoping someone else will recognize the last specimen for you as I dont--its outstanding though! 

 

Regards, Chris 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_E1137.thumb.JPG.0f9294c644a295bf1a678a6d7e8bb532.JPG

 

The closest match available from McLoughlin 1996 (posted above LINK 1) is a fragment of Hausmannia sp.

 

My guru of Australian paleobotany has replied this specimen is: Hausmannia crenata  a dipteridacean fern.

  • I found this Informative 3
  • Thank You 1

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, piranha said:

IMG_E1137.thumb.JPG.0f9294c644a295bf1a678a6d7e8bb532.JPG

 

The closest match available from McLoughlin 1996 (posted above LINK 1) is a fragment of Hausmannia sp.

 

My guru of Australian paleobotany has replied this specimen is: Hausmannia crenata  a dipteridacean fern.

Man that's weird. Look like may apple. https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/dinosaurs/images/9/97/Hausmannia.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20190723162847

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the references   - they are very helpful.   Hausmannia crenata  looks like a good match for the specimen that has excited comment.  Although this specimen appears move circular in each of the two lobes and less crenulated. The leaves in Photos 1 and 2 are fairly common in the sandstone but the possible Hausmannia is the only one I have seen. I was here over the wet due to covid and spent lots of time searching! I will print the papers for reference and keep tract of where I see what. All these are from Gantheaume Point Broome. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...