Jump to content

Fossil's or just stones ?


Mendel28

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone.

My son and i are both passionate about paleontology. During our research’s, we found these stones in red clay/sand with flint dating from Cenomanian (near Chartres, France). The stones were among the remains of bivalves and sponges. All the fossils found show strong erosion.

Do you think it could be fossils or just stones?

Thank you

 

1.JPG

A (1).JPG

A (2).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to TFF:)

As I see, there are are no rocks. 

First picture reminds me of bivalve fragments(some of them might be Rastellum sp.), second of rudist fragments(lower or upper valve terminals).

Edited by abyssunder

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply ! We hoped so much to have found very eroded mosasaurs teeth... Maybe another time :fingerscrossed:

Could you help me on this stone found today in the same layer (cenomanian)?

The stone is fragile, it looks like spongy bone in its center. Perhaps it is a nodule of flint...

1 (1).JPG

1 (2).JPG

1 (3).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what is in the last picture, perhaps the core of a flint nodule, I mean a possible sponge. (?)

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...