Jump to content

Labial side and Lingual side?


TeethCollector

Recommended Posts

I have a rooted Carcharodontosaurus indet tooth and trying to determine which part is lingual and labial. I know I can determine lingual side and labial side by using the curvature of mesial and distal, but this tooth is kinda confusing... 

 

Thanks

 

20210728_132227.thumb.jpg.554576859f55a67a62c31f65b64431f2.jpg

Mesial

 

 

20210728_132216.thumb.jpg.03607d24bbb645f2ac79f2acd9e3bc01.jpg

distal

 

 

20210728_121252.thumb.jpg.4498cc91ff4e1207c97db6f6ac7a4178.jpg

One side with groove

 

 

20210728_121239.thumb.jpg.b505f9447b864262420a35687310306c.jpg

Another side without the groove

 

 

 

20210728_121322.thumb.jpg.ca45e059a48ff7ff32d54a17a305f89e.jpg20210728_121316.thumb.jpg.4f0061d8385fc6c89a20a6c48b0082f4.jpg

 

Crown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These lateral teeth can be pretty uniform.  Unfortunately the tooth does not have a resorption pit which easily determines the lingual side.  It does however have both a lingual & labial depression in the root. The base of the root concave curvature is on this side so I would guess this is the lingual side and allow the replacement tooth to come up.

20210728_121252.jpg.806cc7b2218e19da59c6d3c04b307707.thumb.jpg.e5e5efda69aa31406afd86cc2adcc6f6.jpg

 

 

Just a minor ID  point you identify the tooth as a Carcharodontosaurus indet.  Its really a Carcharodontosaurid indet since we cannot determine what genus it is only family.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Troodon said:

These lateral teeth can be pretty uniform.  Unfortunately the tooth does not have a resorption pit which easily determines the lingual side.  It does however have both a lingual & labial depression in the root. The base of the root concave curvature is on this side so I would guess this is the lingual side and allow the replacement tooth to come up.

 

Just a minor ID  point you identify the tooth as a Carcharodontosaurus indet.  Its really a Carcharodontosaurid indet since we cannot determine what genus it is only family.

 

Thank you!

 

Were there Carcharodontosaurid theropod in the Kem Kem other than C.saharicus?

If this is a Carcharodontosaurid tooth and C.saharicus is the only one from Kem Kem, I think this can be identified as C.saharicus ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Troodon said:

Sauroniops pachytholus is the other Carcharodontosaurid in the Kem Kem Group

Are their teeth identifiable between each other? If not, would that mean shops ID-ing teeth as saharicus inaccurate? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, carch_23 said:

Are their teeth identifiable between each other? If not, would that mean shops ID-ing teeth as saharicus inaccurate? 

 

The holotype of Sauroniops did not include teeth so we really dont know if they have different characteristics but its unlikely if you look at Carcharodontosaurid teeth from South America.    So those sellers that label teeth as C. saharicus or the African Trex are inaccurate.   Unfortunately misinformation abounds with sellers when it comes to Morrocan teeth.   Many call Abelisaurid type teeth as raptor.  We most likely have multiple species of Spinosaurids yet everyone calls them S. aegyptiacus.  Finally you see lots of Deltadromeus or Dromaeosaur teeth being sold yet we are clueless in what they look like.   Also collectors encourage these practices since teeth with species names or "raptor" sell better than family names.  

  • I found this Informative 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...