TwoOaks Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 I'm a newbie to The Fossil Forum. I hike in the hilly areas of south-central Indiana (mainly Morgan, Monroe & Brown counties) whenever I get a chance and many times I end up walking the rocky creek beds looking for fossils & unusual rocks. These creeks are rich in geodes and there is a lot of shale & limestone. I believe that some of the unusual finds are geodized fossils. I have several that I'd like to share with the forum to get opinions from the experts. Attaching multiple photos (15 total: 3 groups of 5) of 4 different specimens with the first five photos showing a pair which have similarities. Thanks in advance for any input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kane Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 Nice pieces! I am thinking coral for the longer one, or possibly crinoid. There is a lot of Ordovician in your area, so I defer to the locals there to provide a precise identification. 2 ...How to Philosophize with a Hammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 (edited) The first five pictures show geodized crinoid stems, in my opinion. Picture from here: https://www.mindat.org/mesg-545970.html Edited August 22, 2021 by abyssunder 2 " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetradium Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 1 hour ago, Kane said: Nice pieces! I am thinking coral for the longer one, or possibly crinoid. There is a lot of Ordovician in your area, so I defer to the locals there to provide a precise identification. The last one somehow remind me of Murex but no way. Most likely a shell of some kind. 1 hour ago, Kane said: Nice pieces! I am thinking coral for the longer one, or possibly crinoid. There is a lot of Ordovician in your area, so I defer to the locals there to provide a precise identification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kane Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 I agree with @abyssunder -- crinoidal. ...How to Philosophize with a Hammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 +5 for crinoidal. Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetradium Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 8 minutes ago, Kane said: I agree with @abyssunder -- crinoidal. I'm just going to leave the last one up to you guys. Its just so unnerving how just from a picture alone makes me think so strongly of something else when its best to just go with the most common logical choices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kane Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 3 minutes ago, Tetradium said: I'm just going to leave the last one up to you guys. Its just so unnerving how just from a picture alone makes me think so strongly of something else when its best to just go with the most common logical choices. Identification from photos is an art and not a science. I think all of us are more than willing to entertain alternative suggestions. 1 ...How to Philosophize with a Hammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetradium Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 Just now, Kane said: Identification from photos is an art and not a science. I think all of us are more than willing to entertain alternative suggestions. True. To me it look so strongly like a geography distorted and mineralized murex - even there "appear" to be whorls, ridges, remains of previous lips. Then covering it mouth that look like a jingle shell (Anomina ephippium) its on. The resembles is so eerie to me. Even fossil jingle shells from Florida have a few of what I'm guessing as remains of muscle mineralized in low oxygen muck but there's so many in this picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkinhead Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 In this case, the fossils are almost certainly Ordovician, which would be too old for a gastropod of that type. And the op is right when he says that they're geodized- lots of mineralized critters have cavities in them in which minerals, usually carbonates or quartz, precipitate some time after the death of the organism. It's common and visually striking in most of the Paleozoic stuff I have experience with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetradium Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 39 minutes ago, Pumpkinhead said: In this case, the fossils are almost certainly Ordovician, which would be too old for a gastropod of that type. And the op is right when he says that they're geodized- lots of mineralized critters have cavities in them in which minerals, usually carbonates or quartz, precipitate some time after the death of the organism. It's common and visually striking in most of the Paleozoic stuff I have experience with. That's why I was just talking about the irony of it. A murex species found in Indiana? Naaah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetradium Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 4 minutes ago, Tetradium said: 48 minutes ago, Pumpkinhead said: In this case, the fossils are almost certainly Ordovician, which would be too old for a gastropod of that type. And the op is right when he says that they're geodized- lots of mineralized critters have cavities in them in which minerals, usually carbonates or quartz, precipitate some time after the death of the organism. It's common and visually striking in most of the Paleozoic stuff I have experience with. You can see a modern murex species that I have. Its just a example of how sometime just looking at pictures online can fools us without knowing a huge variety of additional information like locations, formation, directions of glaciers, upriver, just to name some information. Even modern shells can be a huge headache as information tend to be sparse. For example it took me 3 years to finally find a mangrove periwinkle on Atlantic side of Florida. All the books, online information says they are found where mangroves are, meaning suppose 2/3 of Florida coasts. But when I finally found them I could see what was wrong with the information - they only live in colonies and rarely ventures far from them and they along with certain species of bivalves and gastropods only live along inlets on Atlantic side for a certain distance - beyond that its what I called bubble shell zone (the genus is actually closely related to freshwater gastropods and mostly only found in brackish water) then the most remote sections of mangroves only had one species of fiddle crabs - no shells of any kinds because temperature, how much salt is in them, low oxygen is too much even for shells to try to survive in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connorp Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 2 hours ago, Pumpkinhead said: In this case, the fossils are almost certainly Ordovician, which would be too old for a gastropod of that type. These are Mississippian, not Ordovician. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoOaks Posted August 24, 2021 Author Share Posted August 24, 2021 Thank you everybody for your input! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubykicks Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 Those are pretty! I've found so many geodized fossils like that near Brown County. The ones I find are usually pink and pale blue. Almost like opal, but I'm not really sure, maybe chalcedony. Anyway, cool finds! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Pristis Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 Definitely Mississippian in age. These are pseudomorphs after crinoids, et al. http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? ---Shakespeare, The Tempest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now