Jump to content

04 Sep 2021: Small plant impressions at Belt, MT


kehaz

Recommended Posts

Upon doing some research on exposures near Great Falls, and from a tip I received from a fellow member of my local prospector's group, I found an exposure just outside of Belt that is somewhat known for its plant fossils. Roadside Geology of Montana has this area of the state marked as early Cretaceous, but the large Jurassic coal seam cutting through the middle of this exposure was apparent as soon as I parked. I scrambled up the loose shale and sandstone to the seam, where I almost immediately began to spot small impressions in the dark-gray shale.

 

20210904_132024.thumb.jpg.be421fb13c0af0a281e6aaaa532216a3.jpg

 

20210904_132025.thumb.jpg.2f3fd43191db3aae7aefbc235bb072aa.jpg

 

20210904_132027.thumb.jpg.c7fe286012d1f480d3ae572f069ccf40.jpg

 

The shale was incredibly fragile and would often crumble at a slight touch, and it was a new experience for me in handling rock that didn't need a hammer and chisel to split. I spent most of the trip sifting through the loose shale that had slid from the exposure and gently prying open larger pieces with my fingers or a small, thin chisel. This was definitely an exercise in patience, as I had to really slow down and be gentle with the shale as to not shatter the pieces in my hands. After about 2 hours, my husband and the dog were incredibly bored, as their adventure down to Belt Creek was unexciting, and the heat was getting to them. So, as is often the case with my hunts, I had to leave earlier than I wanted. But I am incredibly happy with my finds, small as they may be, and I plan on returning to this little spot soon.

 

I'm not too familiar with plants in this area, as most of this part of the state is Cretaceous or Mississippian marine, so if anyone would like to offer some IDs, I would love them! I'm trying to be diligent in cataloguing all my finds, so anything helps!

 

1820485985_20210904_160806trim.thumb.jpg.d6f94e1daaf40fcf94cde81e716043dd.jpg

 

1186965086_20210908_152903trim.thumb.jpg.f8c1ae950f46c5d9d4f28639ce69d40a.jpg

 

Some of them really shine when wet, as I found when I was cleaning them up. The dark-gray of the shale is also much more apparent.

1302694378_20210908_153624trimadjust.thumb.jpg.6d3be9d2decd2c58531732b085674f47.jpg

 

2024917650_20210904_194548trim.thumb.jpg.d5adbe762c5a50fdfab2b9bf95e4535c.jpg

 

202884452_20210908_153539trim.thumb.jpg.9eb7285e60a621cd8edf9a3a5370a5e5.jpg

 

1521586089_20210904_194341trim.thumb.jpg.27cd9b0466cff1037a59d56908a2ca67.jpg

 

1861254058_20210908_153602trimadjust.thumb.jpg.0cab8c96f32200e7fe954c512137848c.jpg

 

1157421870_20210908_153550trim.thumb.jpg.3abf191da0938c0300fc348e4651a44e.jpg

 

I know they're small and not particularly impressive or rare, but I am incredibly happy with my little haul.

 

Thanks for stopping by on my adventure; I hope you have a great day!

  • Enjoyed 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, minnbuckeye said:

I find them very impressive!!!!!! Eyes of the beholder I guess.

 

I guess when I think of "impressive," I think of large and unbroken specimens. I'm not jaded, I swear! I absolutely love all of my little fossils, no matter how small or fragmented they are!

  • Enjoyed 1
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice finds for sure.  :) 

Thanks for posting.

 

  • Thank You 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing how similar plant fossils look over huge amounts of time. How did you determine that the coal was Jurassic instead of early Cretaceous? Great fossils!

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome finds! We don't see Mesozoic plant material posted here often. Very cool!

  • Enjoyed 1

Follow me on Instagram (@fossil_mike) to check out my personal collection of fossils collected and acquired over more than 15 years of fossil hunting!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Plax said:

How did you determine that the coal was Jurassic instead of early Cretaceous?

 

Roadside Geology of Montana talks about the black-shale Jurassic Morrison Formation laying directly underneath the sandstone Cretaceous Kootenai Formation in exposures along Belt Creek and the eastern part of the Great Falls-Lewiston coal fields. It also talks about how the Sevier orogeny event buried the Jurassic swamp deposits under the mountains that raised up throughout the Cretaceous. I have also read a few geological and coal surveys that examine these two formations and how they essentially butt up against one another, but I don't believe that the surveys get too close to Belt city limits, which is about where I was finding the impressions. So I suppose I don't know for 100% sure if it is late Jurassic or early Cretaceous, but based on the research I've done, I'd bet on Jurassic. Feel free to correct me, however; I try to do my homework but I'm not a professional :D

 

Here's a few of the surveys I've read:

https://deq.mt.gov/files/Land/AbandonedMines/documents/CoalDocuments/GTFCoalField_HistoricOverview.pdf

https://mbmg.mtech.edu/pdf/geologyvolume/Gunderson_CoalGeologyFInal.pdf

Edited by kehaz
Fixed geographical info about coal field location
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/9/2021 at 7:13 PM, kehaz said:

 

Roadside Geology of Montana talks about the black-shale Jurassic Morrison Formation laying directly underneath the sandstone Cretaceous Kootenai Formation in exposures along Belt Creek and the eastern part of the Great Falls-Lewiston coal fields. It also talks about how the Sevier orogeny event buried the Jurassic swamp deposits under the mountains that raised up throughout the Cretaceous. I have also read a few geological and coal surveys that examine these two formations and how they essentially butt up against one another, but I don't believe that the surveys get too close to Belt city limits, which is about where I was finding the impressions. So I suppose I don't know for 100% sure if it is late Jurassic or early Cretaceous, but based on the research I've done, I'd bet on Jurassic. Feel free to correct me, however; I try to do my homework but I'm not a professional :D

 

Here's a few of the surveys I've read:

https://deq.mt.gov/files/Land/AbandonedMines/documents/CoalDocuments/GTFCoalField_HistoricOverview.pdf

https://mbmg.mtech.edu/pdf/geologyvolume/Gunderson_CoalGeologyFInal.pdf

Me either! Just asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...