Stego Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 Exact location? Stratigraphy? Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 What is the size of this item? Where in Thailand was it found? Not sure you can say more than "bone fragment" with the information given. The pictures are poorly lit. Try taking them outside, and from directly above the item. All sides should be pictured - Top, Bottom, right side, left side, front and back. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 That's an antler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnJ Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 23 minutes ago, Rockwood said: That's an antler. Or not...it could be the mandibular processes of a partial ramus. 1 The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true. - JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimB88 Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 Didnt realize that Thailand was lost ...but good job finding it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
val horn Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 the architecture it shows on the first photo does not look like bone to me. I would expect that to be wood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 1 hour ago, JohnJ said: Or not...it could be the mandibular processes of a partial ramus. The texture at the upper left of the bottom photo. is what I call a key indication. Would it match your suggestion better ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 In addition to the origin and age of the terrain in which the fossils are found, size is also important for proper identification. I invite you to read my last link in my signature. If you don’t have a rule, print the document I made available and put your fossils on it before making your photos, making sure to leave a box with the apparent size (pedagogical message) Coco ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 Brightened and rotated: 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 33 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said: Brightened and rotated: Appears to be a bit of shrinkage though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now