Jump to content

Tamateur

Recommended Posts

Welcome to the Forum.  :)

 

Looks more like an ironstone concretion, to me.  :unsure:

 

@Archie

  • Thank You 1
  • I Agree 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you really want to test it then break off a piece of the bone and look at the internal  composition  if it is bone embedded in ironstone the internal surface should look like bone  ie compact bone on the circumference  and  trabecular bone in the center  if it is ironstone through out then it is iron stone.

  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironstone concretion showing differentiated sedimentation. Have seen tons of them in the Mazon Creek concretions I've collected. It may have formed around something organic like MC concretions, or maybe not like many MC concretions. Sometimes all it takes is some organic matter 1/2 the size of a pinhead to get the ball rolling, and the concretion will keep growing in size as long as conditions favor growth.

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...