Jump to content

Multiple colors, shapes and sizes (species?) of tube worms


Lone Hunter

Recommended Posts

This might be as interesting as it gets as far as worm tubes, so my question is if they are just tube casts why don't they all look the same? I have only found ones that are usually all greyish and look the same, these almost look like actual worms. Would different species have different tubes?

IMG_20211102_210820137.jpg

IMG_20211102_211056523.jpg

IMG_20211102_211412169.jpg

IMG_20211102_211506926.jpg

IMG_20211102_211557576.jpg

IMG_20211102_211746676.jpg

IMG_20211102_211833676.jpg

IMG_20211102_212657624.jpg

IMG_20211102_212824437.jpg

IMG_20211102_211442521.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not even going to attempt to assign colors, but maybe the smaller ones are steinkerns, and the larger body fossils. Sometimes they get filled. Sometimes they don't.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

different generations (i.e., one species atop another) ? 

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There certainly are many different types of shell-forming worms.  The common catch all has been the genus Serpula. But describing or labeling these as Serpulids is probably better.  And to be clear these are body fossils. They represent a shell created by the original critter not a steinkern or mold.  Most of them grew attached to some sort of shell or hard ground.  But there are also forms like Hamulus that lived free on the substrate.

 

One of the more interesting things we find here in the Cretaceous of Texas are Serpulid tubes attached directly to steinkerns.  This suggests that the steinkern was formed before the worm attached.  The question is are we seeing a fossil form that attached to what was already a fossil? Again totally hard to get your head around until we begin to understand what deep time really means.

  • I found this Informative 2
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, erose said:

One of the more interesting things we find here in the Cretaceous of Texas are Serpulid tubes attached directly to steinkerns.  This suggests that the steinkern was formed before the worm attached.  The question is are we seeing a fossil form that attached to what was already a fossil? Again totally hard to get your head around until we begin to understand what deep time really means.

The preservation that I've noticed made me wonder about something along those lines, but I wasn't quite able to articulate the thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...