Jump to content

Which species or family are these corals?


PaleoOrdo

Recommended Posts

Happy new year to all members!

Today I would like to present some of my finds of tabulate corals. I am grateful if anyone can help to identify the family, genus or species. First I will present corals from the Kalvsjøen formation, late Ordovician in Hadeland, Norway. I think rock 3-8 have the same species.

Rock 1 and 2 are most puzzling so I present those first. I see several kinds of corals in them and not only corals. Can you also see the nautiloid?

640256829_COLRUGCORALCIRCLE1ALUF.thumb.jpg.3e3ec7189fd876fb804a0d5c13ab628b.jpg

 

192047944_COLRUGCORCIRCLE1bLUF.thumb.jpg.aedc3fb3528b892161722de407430872.jpg

 

509689578_RUGCOLCORALLUFB.thumb.jpg.a5b8d47de592cdc4be3fb521e6095be2.jpg

 

230563636_MORECIRLES.thumb.jpg.8915a83b9765ac59d73254a6f81ec23a.jpg

 

374179717_IGJENSIRKLERLUFKJEDEKORAL.thumb.jpg.0756aad1d3c5fef534455b7f181e3e93.jpg

Next, some rocks which I believe have the same kind of coral:

Rock 3 - the biggest coral I found in the area, more than 50 cm broad (still in situ), worthy to be in a museum:

189649122_gigantkorallluf.thumb.jpg.d68696790ca5dcda053372af89c94c8b.jpg

1790033577_gigkorlufb.thumb.jpg.2fe539d2e366f55a29ea55e31337c5fd.jpg707521576_gigkorlufc.thumb.jpg.999c606d504afe29005885544d1b866d.jpg

Rock 4, very smooth surface, maybe rounded by the glacier or river:

477124533_Kalvsjenformfarm1nrgangvegBJV.thumb.jpg.4be784632920d50b43d83ffdc374a825.jpg

374916380_Kalvsjenformfarm1nrgveb.thumb.jpg.9962305e70059422e2a29660289efb0a.jpg

 

766445830_Kalvsjenformfarm1nrgvd.thumb.jpg.9bdf8c64a55cc93619b969aa2c81cb9d.jpg

Rock 5 - size is same for the diameter of the coralittes:

186808584_LFCOLONIALCOR1A.thumb.jpg.5e187dbdf389e9d03e0942890b8d9046.jpg

1976336327_LFCOLONIALCOR1B.thumb.jpg.6e87393847a292fd085b9ecef94c84cb.jpg

Rock 6 - same size of coralites

219725674_CORCOLLUFA5B.thumb.jpg.59a6a149e00f2d7592e7eb83bbf623b2.jpg

Rock 7:IMG_20210819_113006.thumb.jpg.1d343b31294c04d6eed1dc5493ec51dc.jpgIMG_20210819_113000.thumb.jpg.8d47a31ad9fa6422df0a4dc2bdd6be58.jpg

Rock 7 

669154323_NICEBLUECOLCORLUF.thumb.jpg.e0af70c8f88dcfe2c120bca8b85fb947.jpg1974145515_NICEBRUECOLCORLUF.thumb.jpg.52a09bf7ee156d792abd15c9ae6f426f.jpg1972604975_NICEBLUECOLCORLUFC.thumb.jpg.c77f516db8bb686948d340888c069543.jpg

Rock 8- in situ:

768401281_insitukolonikorallluf2.thumb.jpg.a0cfaf7459532c155ef9e97519d41b41.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

  • Enjoyed 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not in absolute my comfort field, but couldn't those first specimens be some kind of sponge?

Edited by oyo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/1/2022 at 6:52 PM, oyo said:

couldn't those first specimens be some kind of sponge?

I do'nt know if you are right or wrong. I thought they are some kind of corals, but I guess not only corals have circular patterns. I hope someone with more knowledge than me can present their opinions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure about 1 - it's ringing a bell but I can't remember where I've seen it.

 

The others (including the smaller circles of no. 2) look like the tabulate Sarcinula (order Sarcinulida) which has characteristic corallites joined by horizontal platforms, well known from the U. Ordovician of Norway. 

Edited by TqB
  • I found this Informative 1

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have got a lovely bunch of very old corals up there! Thanks for sharing!

 

On 12/31/2021 at 12:00 PM, PaleoOrdo said:

maybe rounded by the glacier or river:

 

Not necessarily, weathering in the soil zone can do that, too. Have a look at all the other rooks: All are quite rounded and smooth.

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, FranzBernhard said:

You have got a lovely bunch of very old corals up there! Thanks for sharing!

You are welcome, hope you enjoyed!

11 hours ago, FranzBernhard said:

Not necessarily, weathering in the soil zone can do that, too. Have a look at all the other rooks: All are quite rounded and smooth.

Yes, that may be right. Moreover, I read somewhere that these corals was somehow rounded originally.

Edited by PaleoOrdo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TqB said:

The others (including the smaller circles of no. 2) look like the tabulate Sarcinula (order Sarcinulida) which has characteristic corallites joined by horizontal platforms, well known from the U. Ordovician of Norway. 

Yes, I can see the horizontal platforms in some of my rocks. Thanks a lot for the help. It is a great pleasure to know the order and genus name of my finds.

I found some information online on Sarincula which states that this genus we only can find in the Ordovician, and as I understand this genus is later in Ordovicium that other genus in the same order.

Why are the rings or corallittes so bright white in color? It the reason that they are preserved as calcite, while oriinally made of aragonite? I read somewhere that all corals in Palaeozoicum was made of aragonite.

Concering some of the first pictures, it is puzzling that the size of the coralittes in the same rock is not the same.

My finds of corals in the location includes also some chain corals and other tabulates which I will present in my next post.

Edited by PaleoOrdo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Concerning the above circular unknow coral, to the right side, with some other things, I took this photo with microscope:

 399361974_LUFTUNGS.jpg.f0f81332562c701b792150b920db9a4f.jpg

Then there is this petoskey-like rock. Maybe a kind of rugose corals?

IMG_20211130_142819.thumb.jpg.006a0c8d828bed0e6d3980e8523dd0d8.jpgIMG_20211130_142756.thumb.jpg.d819268a0c1563aeae86acaa803f102d.jpgIMG_20211130_142712.thumb.jpg.b492c94c5d5c81d1d2cd820b43f355db.jpgIMG_20211130_142651.thumb.jpg.21437c2eba5490e3ed0f914ba232b97c.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PaleoOrdo said:

Then there is this petoskey-like rock. Maybe a kind of rugose corals?

Overall, it looks very much like the tabulate coral Thamnopora boloniensis of the middle Devonian (Eifelian) Plabutsch-Formation around me. Sure its not the same ;). Length of largest coral is ca. 49 mm.

image.jpeg

 

Here are some more:
Thamnopora boloniensis (link to my personal homepage)

 

6 hours ago, PaleoOrdo said:

I read somewhere that these corals was somehow rounded originally.

For sure! Its possible to have the original roundish growth form preserved if the colonies were embedded in "mud" after their life.

If they were encased in pure limestone, they tend to form a "unity" with the host rock. On "smashing" (naturally or by man), you will get angular fragments, later rounded by different kinds of exogene actions.

Of course, you can also have a combination.

 

Very nice chain corals, it seem, you are having a coral dream land nearby :).

 

Have you ever tried polishing small (< 5 cm), ugly or scratched specimens?

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PaleoOrdo said:

I read somewhere that all corals in Palaeozoicum was made of aragonite.

It is Mesozoic and later corals (scleractinians) that are aragonite. Rugose and tabulate corals were probably mostly calcite, hence their usual good preservation.

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TqB said:

It is Mesozoic and later corals (scleractinians) that are aragonite. Rugose and tabulate corals were probably mostly calcite, hence their usual good preservation.

Thank you for the explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, FranzBernhard said:

Overall, it looks very much like the tabulate coral Thamnopora boloniensis of the middle Devonian

Yes, it is quite similar in shape. Very nice speciemen in your homepage. Thanks for showing it. Is a Thamnopora boloniensis favosite or "rugose colonial"? If so, my speciemens should also be.

I find it difficult to see the difference between the rugose and the small colonial corals, as in this speciemen where it is two similar but different corals, in the middle to the left side in the photo (the rock is too big to bring home, so it is still in situ). One colonial and one rugose here?

1380734589_bryozoanslenderKalvsjformgrindvollen.thumb.jpg.2c8a0eae281225ff1c6013c62750e559.jpg

7 hours ago, FranzBernhard said:

Very nice chain corals, it seem, you are having a coral dream land nearby

Indeed! It seems that in Late Ordovician corals are abundant, especially in this formation. 

7 hours ago, FranzBernhard said:

Have you ever tried polishing small (< 5 cm), ugly or scratched specimens?

So far I only clean the fossils with water and a toothbrush. The surface of the limestones are easily destoyed even if I use hot water. You have any advice of how to polish limestones? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, PaleoOrdo said:

Thamnopora boloniensis

This is a tabulate coral.

 

38 minutes ago, PaleoOrdo said:

The surface of the limestones are easily destoyed even if I use hot water.

Yes, same here! The weathering brings out the details and the contrast between fossil and host rock. Even a good scrub can destroy this surface layer.

Polishing should only be done on ugly specimens (scratched etc.). Just pieces you would not collect in the first place ;).

 

Usually, "my" Eifelian specimens give very poor contrast upon polishing and are very dark, nature is much better in doing that. Here is a usual example, with contrast quite strongly enhanced after scanning:

FavositesStyriacus_Stromatopore_Oelberg_AN4034AN4035_kompr.jpg

 

Here is an exceptional specimen, the only one of this colorfull and rather bright type I have:

AN_Stromatopore_ThamnoporaBoloniensis_FuerstenstandSSW_AN3951_AN3952_Hoeherechts53mm_E_kompr.jpg

 

Concerning polishing, you may check this out

 

and this:

 

You may also check out youtube, many vids about rock polishing there!


Franz Bernhard

Edited by FranzBernhard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FranzBernhard said:

Usually, "my" specimen give very poor contrast upon polishing, nature is much better in that.

That is often the case, as in this rock from Ordovician, some small corals in it, which may be not so interesting, but the rock is sliced as if it was done by a machine and polished by nature into a straight very smooth surface and colored. It looks as if you look into the a painting or the Ordovician water:

 

IMG_20210921_235930.thumb.jpg.f8cf516b6b0510bcdad50ca5c785a669.jpg

 

Thanks a lot, Franz, for your very nice photos, advices and links for polishing!

  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Another Sarincula tabulate coral I found show more clearly the shapes. It is found another place, and I wounder if this is a limestone or a sandstone? It would be helpful to know, because I not sure of the formation, if it is silurian or ordovician, the sandstones in the area being silurian.

2111981268_BIGSTARKORALLNORDFS.thumb.jpg.1c4476b9404281e8747ec652bc060bf9.jpg

Edited by PaleoOrdo
  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...