Jump to content

Ceratopsid Skull Element or Piece of Ankylosaur Osteoderm?


PaleoNoel

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I wanted to get some opinions on this piece I found in Montana's Hell Creek formation this past summer. My initial thoughts were that it was a ceratopsid skull fragment. It was a fossil I was planning on selling, but before I do I wanted to rule out the possibility that it was a piece of ankylosaur osteoderm as I have significantly less material from that clade of dinosaurs. The dimensions are about 8 cm by 7 cm. 

IMG_8401.thumb.jpg.643674cd3bab88980aeed5672b184034.jpg

IMG_8399.thumb.jpg.55c193e129e8baa1922406e44528116c.jpg

IMG_8400.thumb.jpg.407f2220ba786b890d3cff74ef089460.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The surface holes/foramen are not typical of an Osteoderm or skull element.   What's the profile in lateral view, could it be an ungual?

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/8/2022 at 4:16 PM, Troodon said:

The surface holes/foramen are not typical of an Osteoderm or skull element.   What's the profile in lateral view, could it be an ungual?

I think you may be right. After some comparison to Ceratopsid unguals, they appear to be quite similar.

Here's another view:

IMG_8426.thumb.jpg.3459b00bd78b1b34b8dc065c890383fc.jpg

IMG_8425.thumb.jpg.b9e108ee9defbab7dc27c5b95176615a.jpg

 

image.jpeg.7ba9bae132fc5ad287aba63cebd45e44.jpeg

An Triceratops ungual from the Black Hills Institute for comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Randyw said:

Cool find! I wish i could find things like that!

Thank you, I've been very lucky to be able to hunt where I have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...