Jump to content

Yunnanozoon or something else?


DardS8Br

Recommended Posts

The longest one is roughly 2cm long. I’ve counted 12 on the rock, which itself is about 5cm long. All I know is that it’s from the Maotianshan shales in China. I was told it’s a Yunnanozoon, but I believe this is incorrect as the person I got it from is often wrong with their identifications. 

E2BD2858-0335-43D9-9466-301A26B7BEBC.jpeg

A32BD1D4-025C-4B83-AFF1-7542038E981E.jpeg

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, connorp said:

Maybe? Some better pictures would help. They are not very clear.

I’ll try. These were the best images I was able to get, but I *might* be able to get a better one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we get a pic of the complete matrix specimens are in?

I agree, the pictures are quite blurry, and detail is nearly impossible to make out in these photos.  :(

They may not be well preserved enough to make a solid ID.  :shrug:

 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Paleorunner said:

Naraoia SP ?

 

Excuse me, but I don't know how I thought I saw, the blurred form of a Naraoia Spinosa. :headscratch:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather guess Haikouella lanceolata.

E2BD2858-0335-43D9-9466-301A26B7BEBC.jpeg.ba54a30e6af557d880ff667071011e7a.thumb.jpg.7e9afd301be3cd8c882d52227dff8759.jpg

These structures might be branchial arches.

cc68704b6a6005350b77ba6fafec6258.jpg.11a95ab6846b5765c16019064336fb78.jpg

 

Edited by oilshale

Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes (Confucius, 551 BC - 479 BC).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2022 at 5:23 PM, oilshale said:

I would rather guess Haikouella lanceolata.

E2BD2858-0335-43D9-9466-301A26B7BEBC.jpeg.ba54a30e6af557d880ff667071011e7a.thumb.jpg.7e9afd301be3cd8c882d52227dff8759.jpg

These structures might be branchial arches.

cc68704b6a6005350b77ba6fafec6258.jpg.11a95ab6846b5765c16019064336fb78.jpg

 

This was my guess too. It looks strikingly similar to the more poorly preserved Haikouellas I’ve seen listed on places like online. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I acquired this specimen nearly a year ago, and have been puzzling over its true identity. I was told it was a Yunnanozoon, but I doubted that. I recently got digital microscope, and took a picture of the fossil using it, and it revealed something strange. Legs, or something that looks similar. It looks kinda like a lobopod, but it’s tiny. The specimen pictured  is about 1.5cm long and the legs are barely visible to the naked eye. Any ideas what it could be?

 

I made a post when I first got it with pics of the full plate 

 

6FDF0938-1794-4500-9FD3-EA865C3E7D57.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Topics Merged.

 

Enlarged and brightened:

 

6FDF0938-1794-4500-9FD3-EA865C3E7D57.jpeg.285b6c2c28f6eb1d6d115059384c5359.jpeg

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just realized I accidentally made this a reply to my old post instead of a new post. Am I allowed to make this into a new post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DardS8Br said:

I just realized I accidentally made this a reply to my old post instead of a new post. Am I allowed to make this into a new post?

Actually, you had created a new topic for the same item, which was not necessary. A member of our staff merged it with your previous topic. 

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best to keep all information about one fossil in one topic. ;)

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kane said:

Actually, you had created a new topic for the same item, which was not necessary. A member of our staff merged it with your previous topic. 

Ah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Coming back two years later with a little more knowledge, I believe @oilshale was right when he said it potentially could be Haikouella. They appear to be a cluster of poorly preserved specimens that only really preserved the branchial arches

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...