Jump to content

Stromatolite?


mr fossil

Recommended Posts

Hello

i found these on a island in the Red Sea.

the island is literally made of fossils(LITTERALLY) at the bottom of the island you can find corals you would usually find deeper in the sea and as you climb up the mountain you start seeing shallow water creatures like giant clams.

The island reaches 70 meters high and there are fossils up until the top. These fossils(in the pictures) could only be found on the top couple of meters

what could these be?

thank you for your time !

D2F48F26-E6D5-4BA3-95C3-6C778352EDD2.jpeg

02935FC2-B377-4F61-A1A9-87307D318FA0.jpeg

B983C165-65DD-4D05-82F8-FEE947F48535.jpeg

43E11246-35A7-44BC-A74B-144C237697A4.jpeg

E64902DF-9916-4D80-9C35-A9BCC46223B0.jpeg

4D140476-2127-43B9-A750-2F92EE108CF2.jpeg

Edited by mr fossil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they are close to shatter cones.

  • Thank You 1

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, abyssunder said:

I thought they are close to shatter cones.

Yes but the layers are horizontal not vertical. And how would a meteorite cause them in the sea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Difficult to see any clear fossile there, the rock is similar to one I found in Norway with more crystals (quartz or calcite?) than calsium carbonate. Like this rock (mine with more coarse crystals) with not well preserved fossiles, a brachiopod and a coral:

573671034_kvantskrystbrachogrugkor.thumb.jpg.2355cc414415c46120b03183fc55f3f6.jpg

Edited by PaleoOrdo
  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PaleoOrdo said:

Difficult to see any clear fossile there, the rock is similar to one I found in Norway with more crystals (quartz or calcite?) than kalsiumkarbonate. Like this rock (mine with more coarse crystals) with not well preserved fossiles, a barchipod and a coral:

573671034_kvantskrystbrachogrugkor.thumb.jpg.2355cc414415c46120b03183fc55f3f6.jpg

Interesting 

cool fossil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mr fossil said:

Interesting 

cool fossil

Yes, I like it even if not so well preserved. It was found in a place where is like a hill full of crystal rocks, I think it is silurian when the caledonian mountains emerged with bigger rivers full of crystal sediments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what is really the difference between calcite and quarts, seems OP is more full of calcite crystals, while mine is like "semi-quartz" enriched? If I am not wrong, some fossiles are pure quartz or coarse calcite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, PaleoOrdo said:

I wonder what is really the difference between calcite and quarts, 

Calcite: CaCO3
Quartz: SiO2

:D 

  • I found this Informative 1

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a form of calcareous sinter similar to that which can be found in stalactites and stalagmites. Deposited continuously in very many thin concentric layers over time. In other words layered calcite with impurities.

  • I found this Informative 2
  • I Agree 3

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may try googling for 

"Erzbergit",

a more impure, but also finely layered calcium carbonate formation. Essentially a speleothem, formed in siderite rock - ankerite rock - limestone misch-masch.

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ludwigia said:

Deposited continuously in very many thin concentric layers over time. In other words layered calcite with impurities.

I agree about OP. What about my rock, it is similar in apperance but has not layers. Is it a more coarse "not-layered calcite"? Here is another more close up photo of it:

732733412_kvartskrytallisertb.thumb.jpg.494e1cca706030b4709a4d7ce4e677e2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PaleoOrdo said:

I agree about OP. What about my rock, it is similar in apperance but has not layers. Is it a more coarse "not-layered calcite"? Here is another more close up photo of it:

 

 

Limestone with amorphous calcite and calcitized brachiopods.

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's calcite reacts with acid, if not it's quartz. Make the acid test with the powder of a tiny piece of the specimen (not the surrounding matrix). If it fizz it's calcite.

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ludwigia said:

Limestone with amorphous calcite and calcitized brachiopods.

Thanks a lot for the explanation!

 

22 minutes ago, abyssunder said:

If it's calcite reacts with acid, if not it's quartz. Make the acid test with the powder of a tiny piece of the specimen (not the surrounding matrix). If it fizz it's calcite.

Thanks a lot for the advice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...