Pleuromya Posted August 2, 2022 Share Posted August 2, 2022 A thin section of Devonian Rhynie Chert from Rhynie, Scotland. It is of the plant Aglaophyton major with Palaeomyces gordoni fungal cysts. Vascular tissue of the plants can also be seen. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringing Fossils to Life Posted August 2, 2022 Share Posted August 2, 2022 Devonian Eldredgeops rana trilobites from Penn Dixie. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted August 2, 2022 Share Posted August 2, 2022 14 minutes ago, Mochaccino said: For the Silurian, a Bumastus ioxus trilobite from the Rochester Shale of Middleport, New York, USA. Holloway 2021 has recently reclassified Bumastus ioxus as a junior synonym of Bumastus barriensis. Remarks: Historically widely reported both stratigraphically and geographically, Bumastus was restricted by Holloway & Lane (1998: 872) to three named species in addition to the type; one of those species, B. ioxus (Hall, 1867) is a junior subjective synonym of B. barriensis (see following remarks on that species). The genus has a stratigraphic range of Wenlock to possibly Ludlow and a geographical distribution in eastern and central North America (Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana, New York, Ontario, Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma) and the Welsh Borderlands of England. ‘Illaenus’ ioxus was proposed by Hall (1867: 378) for specimens from the Racine Formation of Wisconsin that in the first half of the same paper (p. 332), printed a couple of years before the remainder, he assigned to ‘Illaenus (Bumastus)’ barriensis. Also assigned to the new species were specimens he had earlier (Hall 1843; Hall 1852) identified as barriensis, from the Rochester Formation (Sheinwoodian) of New York. Hall (1867) recorded ioxus in Wisconsin from ‘Racine, Waukesha, Wauwatosa, and other places’. I can identify no significant morphological differences between the Wisconsin and British specimens, and consequently regard B. ioxus as a junior synonym of B. barriensis. I have not examined any specimens of the Bumastus species attributed to B. ioxus from the Rochester Formation, and the specimens illustrated have all been crushed (e.g. Levi-Setti 1975: pl. 77; Levi-Setti 1993: pl. 171; Whiteley et al. 2002: pl. 11; Lawrance & Stammers 2014: fig. on p. 356). Weller (1907: 223) suggested that they are not conspecific with the specimens from Wisconsin; however, like Raymond (1916: 21), I can see no evidence to support this view, and hence I assign the Rochester Formation specimens also to B. barriensis. text from: Holloway, D.J. 2021 Middle Silurian Trilobites from Arkansas and Oklahoma, USA. Order Corynexochida. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 319(1-6):1-55 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted August 2, 2022 Share Posted August 2, 2022 Goniatites sp. from the Early Carboniferous (simultaneous with Mississippian) at Bad Grund in Lower Saxony, Germany. 1 9 Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted August 2, 2022 Share Posted August 2, 2022 Peripristis (probably P. semicircularis) tooth from the late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Doniphan Shale, Dennis Limestone Member, of Sarpy County Nebraska. It's about 7/8 inches high and just over a half inch wide. The label in the photo is the one I made in the early 90's when I received the tooth in a trade from a collector in Nebraska. I vaguely recall these teeth were identified as Ctenoptychius at the time but it might have been my mistake). 1 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mochaccino Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 8 hours ago, piranha said: Holloway 2021 has recently reclassified Bumastus ioxus as a junior synonym of Bumastus barriensis. Remarks: Historically widely reported both stratigraphically and geographically, Bumastus was restricted by Holloway & Lane (1998: 872) to three named species in addition to the type; one of those species, B. ioxus (Hall, 1867) is a junior subjective synonym of B. barriensis (see following remarks on that species). The genus has a stratigraphic range of Wenlock to possibly Ludlow and a geographical distribution in eastern and central North America (Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana, New York, Ontario, Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma) and the Welsh Borderlands of England. ‘Illaenus’ ioxus was proposed by Hall (1867: 378) for specimens from the Racine Formation of Wisconsin that in the first half of the same paper (p. 332), printed a couple of years before the remainder, he assigned to ‘Illaenus (Bumastus)’ barriensis. Also assigned to the new species were specimens he had earlier (Hall 1843; Hall 1852) identified as barriensis, from the Rochester Formation (Sheinwoodian) of New York. Hall (1867) recorded ioxus in Wisconsin from ‘Racine, Waukesha, Wauwatosa, and other places’. I can identify no significant morphological differences between the Wisconsin and British specimens, and consequently regard B. ioxus as a junior synonym of B. barriensis. I have not examined any specimens of the Bumastus species attributed to B. ioxus from the Rochester Formation, and the specimens illustrated have all been crushed (e.g. Levi-Setti 1975: pl. 77; Levi-Setti 1993: pl. 171; Whiteley et al. 2002: pl. 11; Lawrance & Stammers 2014: fig. on p. 356). Weller (1907: 223) suggested that they are not conspecific with the specimens from Wisconsin; however, like Raymond (1916: 21), I can see no evidence to support this view, and hence I assign the Rochester Formation specimens also to B. barriensis. text from: Holloway, D.J. 2021 Middle Silurian Trilobites from Arkansas and Oklahoma, USA. Order Corynexochida. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 319(1-6):1-55 Oh I had no idea, and that's quite recent too. Is this a generally widely accepted change or still contested? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 On 8/2/2022 at 10:32 PM, Mochaccino said: Oh I had no idea, and that's quite recent too. Is this a generally widely accepted change or still contested? Yes, this revision is widely accepted. Although anything can certainly be contested by a subsequent researcher. In this case however, I doubt there will ever be any serious challenge on this taxon. This well-reasoned taxonomic change was obviously long overdue, as are numerous other antiquated taxa, patiently awaiting a similar tidying up treatment. From a series of three monographs (40 years in the making) on the St. Clair Limestone trilobites.....with great thanks to the dedication of tireless trilobite workers like David Holloway. Holloway, D.J. 1980 Middle Silurian Trilobites from Arkansas and Oklahoma, U.S.A. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 170:1-85 Holloway, D.J. 2021 Middle Silurian Trilobites from Arkansas and Oklahoma, USA. Order Corynexochida. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 319:1-55 Holloway, D.J. 2021 Middle Silurian Trilobites from Arkansas and Oklahoma, USA. Orders Lichida and Odontopleurida. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 319:57-131 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 Deltoblastus sp. from the Permian Maubisse Formation on Timor, Indonesia. 10 Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilNerd Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 13 minutes ago, Ludwigia said: Deltoblastus sp. from the Permian Maubisse Formation on Timor, Indonesia. Now those are beautiful! 1 2 The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. -Neil deGrasse Tyson Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieLynn Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 @Ludwigia- WOW. Just WoW. 1 3 www.fossil-quest.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleuromya Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 (edited) A tooth of a Phytosaur hatchling, from the Upper Triassic Bull Canyon Formation of New Mexico. Edited August 3, 2022 by Pleuromya 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieLynn Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 Can I post both a Jurassic and Cretaceous? Since I can't seem to catch the Cretaceous when it comes around!! I'm Hogging BOTH time periods!! Some Jurassic Starfish ossicles - Weymouth UK 8 www.fossil-quest.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieLynn Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 I FINALLY GET TO POST A CRETACEOUS!!! What to put what to put..... Dinosaur Dromaeosaur saurnitholestes Aguja formation 1/4 inch 1 8 www.fossil-quest.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleuromya Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 For the Palaeocene, a Hexanchus shark tooth from the Phosphate Beds of Ben Idir, Morocco. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 (edited) An archaeocete incisor perhaps belonging to Zygorhiza. It's Middle Eocene, Santee Formation, from the Blue Circle Quarry, Harleyville, South Carolina. It's about 3 1/2 inches from top to root break - a little longer if you measure along the curve. I've was once told that the formation is actually the Tupalo Bay Formation but haven't heard anyone else confirm nor question that. A few years ago, it was said that the mine no longer allows fossil collecting. Edited August 4, 2022 by siteseer 2 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 Drepanocheilus speciosus from the Velje Fjord Formation, Oligocene Chatt B at Limfjord Denmark. 6 Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranzBernhard Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 Something very simple but quite well preserved from the Miocene "Florianer Schichten" of the Styrian Basin, Austria: F Franz Bernhard 1 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paleorunner Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 And for the Pliocene this giant Triplofusus of 34 ctms. Sarasota - Florida - USA 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleuromya Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 (edited) A Pleistocene Ursus spelaeus bone from the Carpathian Mountains of Romania. Edited August 5, 2022 by Pleuromya 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR0GRAM Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 I’m gonna steal the Ediacaran this round! Palaeopascichnus linearis from Ukraine. 1 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleuromya Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 Haplophrentis carniatus from the Chisholm Shale, Millard County, Utah. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 The bryozoa Hemiphragma ottawaense from the Late Ordovician Katian Verulam Formation at James Dick Quarry in Gamebridge, Ontario. A site which is unfortunately now closed to the collecting public. 1 10 Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleuromya Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 Loganellia scotica, a jawless fish. Silurian, Upper Llandovery, from the Patrick Burn Formation of Scotland. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 5 hours ago, Pleuromya said: A Pleistocene Ursus spelaeus bone from the Carpathian Mountains of Romania. That is an astragulus (one of the bones that form the ankle). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleuromya Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 1 minute ago, siteseer said: That is an astragulus (one of the bones that form the ankle). Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now